ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2017
Timing of the initiation of parenteral nutrition in critically ill children.
Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nutritional therapy for MRSA sepsis complicated with pulmonary embolism in children under limited energy and nutrient conditions: a case report.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Research progress on nutritional support in the neonatal and pediatric populations receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Nutritional and clinical factors associated with acute kidney injury development in critically ill children.Journal of nephrology · 2023Article
- Timing of parenteral nutrition initiation in critically ill children: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
- The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and the Timing of Safe Feeding in Children with Bronchiolitis.Cureus · 2021Article
- Plasma metabolomics of early parenteral nutrition followed with enteral nutrition in pancreatic surgery patients.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Influencing the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation in the pediatric intensive care unit.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review the current literature evaluating clinical outcomes of early and delayed parenteral nutrition initiation among critically ill children. RECENT
findingsNutritional management remains an important aspect of care among the critically ill, with enteral nutrition generally preferred. However, inability to advance enteral feeds to caloric goals and contraindications to enteral nutrition often leads to reliance on parenteral nutrition. The timing of parenteral nutrition initiation is varied among critically ill children, and derives from an assessment of nutritional status, energy requirements, and physiologic differences between adults and children, including higher nutrient needs and lower body reserves. A recent randomized control study among critically ill children suggests improved clinical outcomes with avoiding initiation of parenteral nutrition on day 1 of admission to the pediatric ICU. SUMMARY: Although there is no consensus on the optimal timing of parenteral nutrition initiation among critically ill children, recent literature does not support the immediate initiation of parenteral nutrition on pediatric ICU admission. A common theme in the reviewed literature highlights the importance of accurate assessment of nutritional status and energy expenditure in deciding when to initiate parenteral nutrition. As with all medical interventions, the initiation of parenteral nutrition should be considered in light of the known benefits of judiciously provided nutritional support with the known risks of artificial, parenteral feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.