Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28375864›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical gastroenterology

Risk Factors for Asparaginase-associated Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.

Judy-April Oparaji, Fateema Rose, Debra Okafor, Amari Howard, Rose L Turner, Abrahim I Orabi, Craig Byersdorfer, Qi Mi, Kim Ritchey, Mark E Lowe and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Pancreatitis from drugs-Drugs for treatment of pancreatitis].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Pegaspargase in Practice: Minimizing Toxicity, Maximizing Benefit.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judy-April Oparaji*Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD †Department of Pediatrics ‡Health Sciences Library System §Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Fateema Rose
Debra Okafor
Amari Howard
Rose L Turner
Abrahim I Orabi
Craig Byersdorfer
Qi Mi
Kim Ritchey
Mark E Lowe
Sohail Z Husain
University of Pittsburgh · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalsTo evaluate potential risk factors for the development of asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP), we performed a systematic review of the current literature from January 1946 through May 2015.

backgroundAsparaginase, a primary treatment for the most common childhood cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), is a well-described cause of pancreatitis. Further, pancreatitis is among the most burdensome and common complications of asparaginase treatment and represents a major reason for early-drug termination and inferior outcomes. The literature lacks clarity about the risk factors for AAP, and this knowledge gap has hampered the ability to reliably predict which patients are likely to develop AAP. STUDY: In an expansive screen, 1842 citations were funneled into a review of 59 full articles, of which 10 were deemed eligible based on predetermined inclusion criteria.

resultsOf the 10 identified studies, only 2 studies showed that children above 10 years of age had a >2-fold risk of AAP compared with younger children. Patients placed in high-risk ALL categories had a greater incidence of pancreatitis in 2 studies. In addition, use of pegylated asparaginase resulted in a higher incidence of AAP in 1 study.

conclusionsIn this systematic review, older age, asparaginase formulation, higher ALL risk stratification, and higher asparaginase dosing appear to play a limited role in the development of AAP. Further studies are needed to probe the underlying mechanisms contributing to the development of pancreatitis in patients receiving asparaginase.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginaseChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansPancreatitisPolyethylene GlycolsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginasepegaspargasePolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID28375864
PMCPMC11488675
OpenAlexW2604868506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.