Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28375751›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Write More Articles, Get More Grants: The Impact of Department Climate on Faculty Research Productivity.

Jennifer Sheridan, Julia N Savoy, Anna Kaatz, You-Geon Lee, Amarette Filut, Molly Carnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Discrimination Toward Physicians of Color: A Systematic Review.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Effect of a Workshop to Break the Bias Habit for Internal Medicine Faculty: A Multisite Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer Sheridan1 Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Julia N Savoy2 Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Anna Kaatz3 Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
You-Geon Lee1 Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Amarette Filut3 Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Molly Carnes1 Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

Exploring the Science of Scientific Review-Admin SupplementR01GM111002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L., DEVINE, PATRICIA G · 2013 to 2017
$3.9M
Advancement of Women in STEMM: A Multi-level Research and Action ProjectR01GM088477 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L. · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088477NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies find that female faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering experience adverse workplace climates. This study longitudinally investigates whether department climate is associated with future research productivity and whether the associations are stronger for female than male faculty.

methodTwo waves of a faculty climate survey, institutional grant records, and publication records were collected for 789 faculties in academic medicine, science, and engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 2000 and 2010. Research productivity was measured as Number of Publications and Number of Grants awarded, and department climate was measured with scales for professional interactions, department decision-making practices, climate for underrepresented groups, and work/life balance. Ordinary least squares and negative binomial regression methods were used to assess gender differences in productivity, influences of department climate on productivity, and gender differences in effects of climate on productivity.

resultsFemale faculty published fewer articles and were awarded fewer grants in the baseline period, but their productivity did not differ from male faculty on these measures in subsequent years. Number of Publications was positively affected by professional interactions, but negatively affected by positive work/life balance. Number of Grants awarded was positively affected by climate for underrepresented groups. These main effects did not differ by gender; however, some three-way interactions illuminated how different aspects of department climate affected productivity differently for men and women in specific situations.

conclusionsIn perhaps the first study to assess the longitudinal impact of department climate on faculty research productivity, positive department climate is associated with significantly greater productivity for all faculty-women and men. However, some positive aspects of climate (specifically, work/life balance) may be associated with lower productivity for some female faculty at specific career periods. These findings suggest that departments that wish to increase grants and publications would be wise to foster a positive workplace climate.

Indexed as

EfficiencyFaculty, MedicalPeriodicals as TopicAwards and PrizesFemaleHumansMalePublicationsResearchResearch Support as TopicSchools, MedicalSex FactorsSexismWisconsinWorkplacedepartment climatefacultygenderresearch productivity

Identifiers

PMID28375751
PMCPMC5446612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.