Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28375679›Full record

ArticleNucleic acid therapeutics2017

Dual-Phase Iontophoresis for the Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides.

Daniel J Gibson, Sonal S Tuli, Gregory S Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene Therapy in the Anterior Eye Segment.Current gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel J Gibson1 Institute for Wound Research, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Sonal S Tuli2 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Gregory S Schultz1 Institute for Wound Research, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In support of ongoing research in the study of corneal and skin wound healing, we sought to improve on previously published results by using iontophoresis to deliver RNA interference-based oligonucleotides. By using a electromechanics-based approach, we were able to devise a two-phase solution that separated the buffering solution from the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) solution. The separation was obtained by making the drug solution a higher density than the buffer, leading it to sink directly onto the tissue surface. This change immediately decreased the distance that the ASO would have to travel before delivery. The changes enabled delivery into ex vivo skin and corneas in 10 or fewer minutes and into in vivo corneas in 5 min. In vivo studies demonstrated short-term bioavailability of at least 24 h, a lack of chemical or thermal injury, a lack of interference in the healing of a corneal injury, and an antisense effect till at least day 7, but not day 14. The only side-effect observed was postdelivery edema that was not present when the vehicle alone was iontophoresed. This suggests that electro-osmotic flow from the delivery chamber was not the mechanism, but that the delivered solute likely increased the tissue's osmolarity. These results support the continued development and utilization of this ASO delivery approach in research-grade oligonucleotides to probe molecular biological pathways and in support of testing therapeutic ASOs in the skin and cornea.

Indexed as

AnimalsConnective Tissue Growth FactorCorneaGene Knockdown TechniquesIontophoresisMiceOligonucleotides, AntisenseRabbitsRNA InterferenceSkinSus scrofaConnective Tissue Growth FactorOligonucleotides, Antisenseantisensebiological variancecorneadeliveryiontophoresisskin

Identifiers

PMID28375679
PMCPMC5564040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.