Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28375678›Full record

ArticleNucleic acid therapeutics2017

Intracellular Distribution and Nuclear Activity of Antisense Oligonucleotides After Unassisted Uptake in Myoblasts and Differentiated Myotubes In Vitro.

Anchel González-Barriga, Bram Nillessen, Julia Kranzen, Ingeborg D G van Kessel, Huib J E Croes, Begoña Aguilera, Peter C de Visser, Nicole A Datson, Susan A M Mulders, Judith C T van Deutekom and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nucleic acid drugs: recent progress and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Renadirsen, a Novel 2'OMeRNA/ENACurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anchel González-Barriga1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Bram Nillessen1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Julia Kranzen1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Ingeborg D G van Kessel1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Huib J E Croes1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Begoña Aguilera2 BioMarin Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands .
Peter C de Visser2 BioMarin Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands .
Nicole A Datson2 BioMarin Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands .
Susan A M Mulders2 BioMarin Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands .
Judith C T van Deutekom2 BioMarin Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands .
Bé Wieringa1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Derick G Wansink1 Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands .
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLBioMarin (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical efficacy of antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) for the treatment of neuromuscular disorders depends on efficient cellular uptake and proper intracellular routing to the target. Selection of AONs with highest in vitro efficiencies is usually based on chemical or physical methods for forced cellular delivery. Since these methods largely bypass existing natural mechanisms for membrane passage and intracellular trafficking, spontaneous uptake and distribution of AONs in cells are still poorly understood. Here, we report on the unassisted uptake of naked AONs, so-called gymnosis, in muscle cells in culture. We found that gymnosis works similarly well for proliferating myoblasts as for terminally differentiated myotubes. Cell biological analyses combined with microscopy imaging showed that a phosphorothioate backbone promotes efficient gymnosis, that uptake is clathrin mediated and mainly results in endosomal-lysosomal accumulation. Nuclear localization occurred at a low level, but the gymnotically delivered AONs effectively modulated the expression of their nuclear RNA targets. Chloroquine treatment after gymnotic delivery helped increase nuclear AON levels. In sum, we demonstrate that gymnosis is feasible in proliferating and non-proliferating muscle cells and we confirm the relevance of AON chemistry for uptake and intracellular trafficking with this method, which provides a useful means for bio-activity screening of AONs in vitro.

Indexed as

EndocytosisAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell NucleusCell ProliferationChloroquineClathrinEndosomesHumansHydrazonesMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalMuscle Fibers, SkeletalChloroquineClathrinHydrazonesN'-(3,4-dihydroxybenzylidene)-3-hydroxy-2-naphthahydrazideOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNAantisensedeliverygene silencingRNAsplicing

Identifiers

PMID28375678
PMCPMC5467152
OpenAlexW2604438258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.