ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018
The clinical significance of DJ-1 and HE4 in patients with endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03459976 (HE4 is a Beneficial Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HE4 is a Beneficial Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Target Therapy.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- HE4 as a Biomarker for Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Kinetics of HE4 and CA125 as prognosis biomarkers during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2021Article
- The Clinical Significance of DJ1 and L1CAM Serum Level Monitoring in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Diagnostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Aberrant Telomere Length in Circulating Cell-Free DNA as Possible Blood Biomarker with High Diagnostic Performance in Endometrial Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- DJ‑1 is a new prognostic marker and predicts chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer.Oncology reports · 2020Article
- DJ‑1 promotes cell proliferation and tumor metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via the Wnt/β‑catenin signaling pathway.International journal of oncology · 2020Article
- The clinical significance of DJ-1 and HE4 in patients with endometrial cancer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe non-invasive diagnostic approach for early detection of endometrial cancer (EC) remains limited. To date, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has been intensively studied but its diagnostic is controversial in EC. DJ-1 is an oncoprotein secreted by cancer cells, recently identified as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer, melanoma, and pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of DJ-1 and HE4 measured in EC patients and healthy controls (HC).
methodsForty-five patients (63.9±12.0 years) with EC and 29 (63.2±13.3 years) HC were enrolled. Serum concentrations of DJ-1 and HE4 were measured using ELISA kits developed by R&D (Minneapolis, USA) and Fujirebio Diagnostic (Malvern, PA, USA), respectively. Differences between EC patients and HC were assessed by Mann-Whitney test and associations were tested by Spearman's correlation. The diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis.
resultsSerum DJ-1 concentrations were found to be higher in EC patients than in HC (9533.6 vs 1988.5 pg/mL; P<.0001). The area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.95 (P<.0001). At the cut-off of 3654 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. HE4 serum levels were higher in EC patients than in HC (75.3 vs 56.2 pmol/L; P=.019), with an AUC of 0.66 (P=.020). The AUC obtained by the combination of the two markers resulted 0.96 (P<.0001).
conclusionThese results suggest that increased serum DJ-1 levels are associated with EC and that this biomarker may be potentially useful for diagnosing EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.