Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374826›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Ovine multiparity is associated with diminished vaginal muscularis, increased elastic fibres and vaginal wall weakness: implication for pelvic organ prolapse.

Stuart Emmerson, Natharnia Young, Anna Rosamilia, Luke Parkinson, Sharon L Edwards, Aditya V Vashi, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Jacinta White, Kirstin Elgass, Camden Lo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animal models for pelvic organ prolapse: systematic review.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Endometrial SUSD2Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart EmmersonThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Natharnia YoungMonash Health, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Anna RosamiliaMonash University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Luke ParkinsonSchool of Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Sharon L EdwardsCSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Aditya V VashiCSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Miranda Davies-TuckThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Jacinta WhiteCSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Kirstin ElgassMicroImaging, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Camden LoMicroImaging, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
John ArkwrightSchool of Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Jerome A WerkmeisterMonash University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Caroline E GargettThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
CSIRO Manufacturing · AUHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUFlinders University · AUMonash Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is a major clinical burden affecting 25% of women, with vaginal delivery a major contributing factor. We hypothesised that increasing parity weakens the vagina by altering the extracellular matrix proteins and smooth muscle thereby leading to POP vulnerability. We used a modified POP-quantification (POP-Q) system and a novel pressure sensor to measure vaginal wall weakness in nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous ewes. These measurements were correlated with histological, biochemical and biomechanical properties of the ovine vagina. Primiparous and multiparous ewes had greater displacement of vaginal tissue compared to nulliparous at points Aa, Ap and Ba and lower pressure sensor measurements at points equivalent to Ap and Ba. Vaginal wall muscularis of multiparous ewes was thinner than nulliparous and had greater elastic fibre content. Collagen content was lower in primiparous than nulliparous ewes, but collagen organisation did not differ. Biomechanically, multiparous vaginal tissue was weaker and less stiff than nulliparous. Parity had a significant impact on the structure and function of the ovine vaginal wall, as the multiparous vaginal wall was weaker and had a thinner muscularis than nulliparous ewes. This correlated with "POP-Q" and pressure sensor measurements showing greater tissue laxity in multiparous compared to nulliparous ewes.

Indexed as

AnimalsElastic TissueFemaleMuscle, SmoothParityPelvic Organ ProlapsePregnancySheepVagina

Identifiers

PMID28374826
PMCPMC5379562
OpenAlexW2604322807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.