Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374819›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2017

Disease Progression in Barrett's Low-Grade Dysplasia With Radiofrequency Ablation Compared With Surveillance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bashar J Qumseya, Sachin Wani, Sherif Gendy, Ben Harnke, Jacques J Bergman, Herbert Wolfsen

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of a diagnosis of 'low-grade dysplasia' in patients with Barrett's esophagus.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current Concepts for Diagnosing Non-Dysplastic and Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett's.Endoscopy international open · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bashar J QumseyaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Archbold Medical Group/Florida State University, Thomasville, Georgia, USA.
Sachin WaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sherif GendyFlorida A &M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Ben HarnkeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jacques J BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Herbert WolfsenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USAcademic Medical Center · NLFlorida Agricultural and Mechanical University · USFlorida State University · USJacksonville College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBarrett's esophagus (BE) is the only identifiable premalignant condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Management of BE with low-grade dysplasia continues to be controversial. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or EAC among patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared with surveillance endoscopy.

methodsOur search included Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central, was limited to English language articles, and was last searched on 31 December 2015. Studies were reviewed by title and abstract, and then full text by two independent reviewers. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Differences were resolved by consensus. The primary outcome of interest was the relative risk of disease progression among patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia treated with RFAcompared with surveillance.

resultsOur search resulted in 2,029 citations, 19 studies were included in the final analysis, totaling 2,746 patients. Relative risk of disease progression in RFA compared with surveillance was 0.14% (95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.45), P=0.001. This measure was stable when only all studies were included. Absolute risk reduction was 10.9% and the number needed to treat was 9.2. Results were stable over several quality measures, overtime, and when excluding randomized trials. The cumulative rate of progression to high-grade dysplasia/EAC was lower in RFA compared with surveillance (1.7% vs. 12.6%, P<0.001).

conclusionsSimilarly, the incidence rate of progression among patients with surveillance was significantly higher from those treated with RFA (0.022 vs. 0.005, P<0.001). RFA results in a significant reduction risk of disease progression to high-grade dysplasia/EAC among patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationPopulation SurveillanceAdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28374819
OpenAlexW2604893478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.