Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374792›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2017

Cell-based secondary prevention of childbirth-induced pelvic floor trauma.

Geertje Callewaert, Marina Monteiro Carvalho Mori Da Cunha, Nikhil Sindhwani, Maurilio Sampaolesi, Maarten Albersen, Jan Deprest

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geertje CallewaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Marina Monteiro Carvalho Mori Da CunhaDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Nikhil SindhwaniDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Maurilio SampaolesiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Woman and Child, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Jan DeprestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEOrgan Recovery Systems (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advancing population age, pelvic-floor dysfunction (PFD) will affect an increasing number of women. Many of these women wish to maintain active lifestyles, indicating an urgent need for effective strategies to treat or, preferably, prevent the occurrence of PFD. Childbirth and pregnancy have both long been recognized as crucial contributing factors in the pathophysiology of PFD. Vaginal delivery of a child is a serious traumatic event, causing anatomical and functional changes in the pelvic floor. Similar changes to those experienced during childbirth can be found in symptomatic women, often many years after delivery. Thus, women with such PFD symptoms might have incompletely recovered from the trauma caused by vaginal delivery. This hypothesis creates the possibility that preventive measures can be initiated around the time of delivery. Secondary prevention has been shown to be beneficial in patients with many other chronic conditions. The current general consensus is that clinicians should aim to minimize the extent of damage during delivery, and aim to optimize healing processes after delivery, therefore preventing later dysfunction. A substantial amount of research investigating the potential of stem-cell injections as a therapeutic strategy for achieving this purpose is currently ongoing. Data from small animal models have demonstrated positive effects of mesenchymal stem-cell injections on the healing process following simulated vaginal birth injury.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationFemaleHumansObstetric Labor ComplicationsPelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersPostnatal CarePregnancySecondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID28374792
OpenAlexW2604378390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.