Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Chuanjun Zhuo, Xiaodong Zhu, Ronghuan Jiang, Feng Ji, Zhonghua Su, Rong Xue, Yuying Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prominent Neuroprotective Potential of Indole-2-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Parkinson's disease, treatment choice and survival over time.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chuanjun ZhuoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaodong ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300075, China.
Ronghuan JiangDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Chinese PLA (People's Liberation Army) General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Feng JiInstitute of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining, 272067, Shandong, China.
Zhonghua SuDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining, 272100, Shandong, China.
Rong XueDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300075, China.
Yuying ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin Brain Center, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Jining Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNTianjin Huanhu Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a long term disorder affects the central nervous system and we aim to determine the relative efficacy of the current available drugs used in PD. Firstly, we performed a systematic review in current literature and eligible studies were retrieved from online databases, relevant data were extracted. Efficacy of these medications was assessed by different Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS). Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were produced by pairwise or network meta-analysis (NMA). Finally, we performed a cluster analysis for the included medications with respect to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Pairwise meta-analysis suggests that selegiline had a higher ranking in UPDRS II, UPDRS III and UPDRS total than bromocriptine and levodopa. Selegiline was more tolerable than bromocriptine (OR = 0.62, CI: 0.39 to 0.98) and pramipexole was less tolerable than levodopa (OR = 1.43, CI = 1.00 to 2.04). Results of NMA indicate that patients with levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole and selegiline exhibited a significantly improved UPDRS III than those with lazabemide. To sum up, levodopa, selegiline, ropinirole and rotigotine were recommended for PD patients as they appeared relatively high efficacy and tolerability.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy, CombinationBromocriptineCluster AnalysisDopamine AgonistsHumansIndolesLevodopaParkinson DiseasePicolinic AcidsPramipexoleSelegilineTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenesBromocriptineDopamine AgonistsIndoleslazabemideLevodopaPicolinic AcidsPramipexoleropinirolerotigotineSelegilineTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID28374775
PMCPMC5379205
OpenAlexW2604839047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.