ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2018
A Novel Technique to Improve the Processing of Minute Ureteroscopic Biopsies.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy and limitations of ureteroscopic biopsy in the staging and grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective analysis at a large tertiary center.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Utilizing decellularized bio-membranes to optimize histopathological embedding of small tissues.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: friend or foe?Arab journal of urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the ability of a new specimen handling technique to improve histopathological yield of ureteroscopic biopsies, performed in patients with suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In a bi-center retrospective study we compared the results of the new tissue handling technique (group 1) with the standard technique (group 2). In the new technique, to achieve maximal tissue preservation, the specimen is mounted on filter paper prior to embedding in paraffin. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which factors are associated with optimal histological results. We further compared the biopsies with the final specimen in a subgroup of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy (NU). Of 55 ureteroscopic biopsies, 1 biopsy from group 1 (new technique) and 3 biopsies from group 2 (standard technique) were inadequate for pathological examination. 51 UTUC specimens were analyzed. Tumor grade and stage were determined in 85% and 63% of the patients in group 1 and in 83% and 25% of group 2 (p=0.85 and p=0.007). Orientation was preserved in 82% of group 1 and 42% of group 2 (p=0.003). On multivariate analysis biopsy technique and biopsy diameter were found to predict stage determination (p=0.01 and p=0.007) and tissue orientation (p=0.005 and p=0.04). Among patients who underwent NU, stage concordance between the biopsy and final pathology was observed in 56% and 27% of the patients in group 1 and 2, respectively. The new processing technique for small UTUC forceps biopsies decreases the rate of biopsies with insufficient material and improves biopsy interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28374346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.