Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374269›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2017

Effect of glaucoma implant surgery on intraocular pressure reduction, flare count, anterior chamber depth, and corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Kyoko Ishida, Naoya Moroto, Kazuhiro Murata, Tetsuya Yamamoto

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Long-term corneal endothelial cell loss after filtration surgery: analysis using natural language processing.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  9. Compared to Trabeculectomy, Ex-PressClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk factors for Ex-PressInternational ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyoko IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan. kyoko.ish@gmail.com.
Naoya MorotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Kazuhiro MurataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Tetsuya YamamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Gifu University · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of filtering surgery using the EX-PRESS device on intraocular pressure (IOP), flare count, anterior chamber (AC) depth, and the corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), including normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study comprised 63 consecutive patients with POAG or NTG. They underwent complete ophthalmologic examinations, including measurement of visual acuity (VA), IOP, flare count, AC depth, and cell density of the corneal endothelium (CE). Two outcomes were used for surgical success: outcome 1 was defined as a ≥20% reduction in the IOP from the preoperative value, with an IOP ≥ 5 mmHg but ≤18 mmHg, and outcome 2 was defined as a ≥20% reduction in the IOP, with an IOP ≥ 5 mmHg but ≤15 mmHg.

resultsThe IOP significantly decreased from 17.7 preoperatively to 12.4 mmHg postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The success rates for outcome 1 at 24 months were 81.3 and 46.7% for POAG and NTG, respectively (P = 0.0065); the corresponding success rates for outcome 2 were 79.4 and 46.7% (P = 0.0120). The flare count significantly increased on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.0002) but recovered to insignificant levels by day 3 (P = 0.0686). A transient decrease in AC depth was observed by 4 weeks after surgery (P = 0.0017). The CE changed from 2529 preoperatively to 2428/mm

conclusionThe advantage of filtering surgery using the EX-PRESS device includes reduced inflammation, and the disadvantages include loss of the CE and reduced effectiveness of NTG.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior Eye SegmentAqueous HumorEndothelium, CornealFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnterior chamber depthCorneal endotheliumEX-PRESSFlare countNormal-tension glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID28374269
OpenAlexW2605102273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.