Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374229›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

The Impact of Curriculum Design in the Acquisition of Knowledge of Oncology: Comparison Among Four Medical Schools.

Dario Cecilio-Fernandes, Wytze S Aalders, André J A Bremers, René A Tio, Jakob de Vries

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Family Physician Training Needs to Improve Cancer Patient Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  2. Assessment of medical students' Surgery knowledge based on Progress Test.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Oncology Training in Rwanda: Challenges and Opportunities for Undergraduate Medical Students (The EDUCAN Project).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dario Cecilio-FernandesCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR), University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FC40, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. d.cecilio.fernandes@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-1680
Wytze S AaldersUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
André J A BremersDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
René A TioCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR) and Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jakob de VriesDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 5 years, cancer has replaced coronary heart disease as the leading cause of death in the Netherlands. It is thus paramount that medical doctors acquire a knowledge of cancer, since most of them will face many patients with cancer. Studies, however, have indicated that there is a deficit in knowledge of oncology among medical students, which may be due not only to the content but also to the structure of the curriculum. In this study, we compared students' knowledge acquisition in four different undergraduate medical programs. Further, we investigated possible factors that might influence students' knowledge growth as related to oncology. The participants comprised 1440 medical students distributed over four universities in the Netherlands. To measure students' knowledge of oncology, we used their progress test results from 2007 to 2013. The progress test consists of 200 multiple-choice questions; this test is taken simultaneously four times a year by all students. All questions regarding oncology were selected. We first compared the growth of knowledge of oncology using mixed models. Then, we interviewed the oncology coordinator of each university to arrive at a better insight of each curriculum. Two schools showed similar patterns of knowledge growth, with a slight decrease in the growth rate for one of them in year 6. The third school had a faster initial growth with a faster decrease over time compared to other medical schools. The fourth school showed a steep decrease in knowledge growth during years 5 and 6. The interviews showed that the two higher-scoring schools had a more focused semester on oncology, whereas in the others, oncology was scattered throughout the curriculum. Furthermore, the absence of a pre-internship training program seemed to hinder knowledge growth in one school. Our findings suggest that curricula have an influence on students' knowledge acquisition. A focused semester on oncology and a pre-internship preparatory training program are likely to have a positive impact on students' progress in terms of knowledge of oncology.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesKnowledge acquisitionOncology knowledgeProgress test

Identifiers

PMID28374229
PMCPMC6208782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.