ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017
[Laparoscopic resection of a giant colon diverticulum : Case report and review of the literature].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare case of multiple giant colonic diverticula successfully treated with laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Popping the Balloon: A Giant Colonic Diverticulum Complicated by Bladder Neck Compression.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Surgical Management of Giant Colonic Diverticulum Presenting After Laparoscopic Lavage for Diverticular Perforation and Sepsis.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
- Intussusception caused by an inverted colonic diverticulum: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiant diverticula are rare complications of diverticular disease. Current opinion regards operative therapy as the method of choice for the treatment of symptomatic giant diverticula; however, there is neither consensus about the technique nor about the necessary extent of resection. Based on a non-systematic review of the literature, an overview of giant diverticula in terms of epidemiology, pathology and classification is given. The current case is considered with respect to appropriate diagnostic procedures and possible therapeutic options. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and dyspnea. A computed tomography scan showed a large gas-filled structure in the upper left abdomen adjacent to the left colon. A giant colonic diverticulum was suspected and laparoscopy was performed. Intraoperatively, the diagnosis of a giant colon diverticulum located at the splenic flexure was confirmed. An unremarkable diverticulosis only was found in the descending colon. The giant diverticulum was treated by an atypical colon wedge resection and the postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: This case report describes a laparoscopic atypical colon wedge resection as treatment of a giant colon diverticulum. Only four laparoscopic bowel resections in terms of sigmoid resections or hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis have been reported. Minimally invasive surgery can be a valuable alternative to open procedures. In the current case a laparoscopic atypical colon wedge resection was safely performed. This option might be considered as an alternative to extended resections of giant diverticula. Localization of the giant diverticulum and the simultaneous existence of diverticular disease are the main criteria for the decision between the different operative approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.