Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28374006›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Optogenetic Activation of Accessory Olfactory Bulb Input to the Forebrain Differentially Modulates Investigation of Opposite versus Same-Sex Urinary Chemosignals and Stimulates Mating in Male Mice.

Tenzin Kunkhyen, Elizabeth A McCarthy, Wayne J Korzan, Danielle Doctor, Xue Han, Michael J Baum, James A Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Neurophysiology of male sexual arousal-Behavioral perspective.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. A unified circuit for social behavior.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tenzin KunkhyenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-5390
Elizabeth A McCarthyDepartment of Biology, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.
Wayne J KorzanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.
Danielle DoctorDepartment of Biology, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.
Xue HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.
Michael J BaumDepartment of Biology, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.
James A CherryDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-692X

Funding

Olfactory Circuits for Reproduction and RewardR01DC008962 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHERRY, JAMES A. · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical or genetic disruption of vomeronasal organ (VNO)-accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) function previously eliminated the ability of male mice to processes pheromones that elicit territorial behavior and aggression. By contrast, neither disruption significantly affected mating behaviors, although VNO lesions reduced males' investigation of nonvolatile female pheromones. We explored the contribution of VNO-AOB pheromonal processing to male courtship using optogenetic activation of AOB projections to the forebrain. Protocadherin-Cre male transgenic mice received bilateral AOB infections with channelrhodopsin2 (ChR2) viral vectors, and an optical fiber was implanted above the AOB. In olfactory choice tests, males preferred estrous female urine (EFU) over water; however, this preference was eliminated when diluted (5%) EFU was substituted for 100% EFU. Optogenetic AOB activation concurrent with nasal contact significantly augmented males' investigation compared to 5% EFU alone. Conversely, concurrent optogenetic AOB activation significantly reduced males' nasal investigation of diluted urine from gonadally intact males (5% IMU) compared to 5% IMU alone. These divergent effects of AOB optogenetic activation were lost when males were prevented from making direct nasal contact. Optogenetic AOB stimulation also failed to augment males' nasal investigation of deionized water or of food odors. Finally, during mating tests, optogenetic AOB stimulation delivered for 30 s when the male was in physical contact with an estrous female significantly facilitated the occurrence of penile intromission. Our results suggest that VNO-AOB signaling differentially modifies males' motivation to seek out female vs male urinary pheromones while augmenting males' sexual arousal leading to intromission and improved reproductive performance.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionOptogeneticsSexual Behavior, AnimalSmellUrineVomeronasal Organolfactoryoptogeneticreproductionvomeronasal

Identifiers

PMID28374006
PMCPMC5362934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.