Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373893›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2017

Comparison of Baseline Wander Removal Techniques considering the Preservation of ST Changes in the Ischemic ECG: A Simulation Study.

Gustavo Lenis, Nicolas Pilia, Axel Loewe, Walther H W Schulze, Olaf Dössel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological electrocardiogram noise.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Weak Supervision for Affordable Modeling of Electrocardiogram Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gustavo LenisKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-0040
Nicolas PiliaKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Axel LoeweKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-4744
Walther H W SchulzeEP Solutions SA, Rue Galilée 7, 1400 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.
Olaf DösselKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most important ECG marker for the diagnosis of ischemia or infarction is a change in the ST segment. Baseline wander is a typical artifact that corrupts the recorded ECG and can hinder the correct diagnosis of such diseases. For the purpose of finding the best suited filter for the removal of baseline wander, the ground truth about the ST change prior to the corrupting artifact and the subsequent filtering process is needed. In order to create the desired reference, we used a large simulation study that allowed us to represent the ischemic heart at a multiscale level from the cardiac myocyte to the surface ECG. We also created a realistic model of baseline wander to evaluate five filtering techniques commonly used in literature. In the simulation study, we included a total of 5.5 million signals coming from 765 electrophysiological setups. We found that the best performing method was the wavelet-based baseline cancellation. However, for medical applications, the Butterworth high-pass filter is the better choice because it is computationally cheap and almost as accurate. Even though all methods modify the ST segment up to some extent, they were all proved to be better than leaving baseline wander unfiltered.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedArrhythmias, CardiacArtifactsComputer SimulationElectrocardiographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID28373893
PMCPMC5361052
OpenAlexW2594692578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.