Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

EEG-Based Cognitive Control Behaviour Assessment: an Ecological study with Professional Air Traffic Controllers.

Gianluca Borghini, Pietro Aricò, Gianluca Di Flumeri, Giulia Cartocci, Alfredo Colosimo, Stefano Bonelli, Alessia Golfetti, Jean Paul Imbert, Géraud Granger, Railane Benhacene and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. P300 Measures and Drive-Related Risks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gianluca BorghiniDept. of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy. gianluca.borghini@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-5671
Pietro AricòDept. of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca Di FlumeriBrainSigns srl, via Sesto Celere, 00152, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-051X
Giulia CartocciDept. of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Alfredo ColosimoDept. of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic & Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Stefano BonelliDeepBlue srl, Piazza Buenos Aires 20, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Alessia GolfettiDeepBlue srl, Piazza Buenos Aires 20, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Jean Paul ImbertÉcole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile, 7 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Géraud GrangerÉcole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile, 7 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Railane BenhaceneÉcole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile, 7 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Simone PozziDeepBlue srl, Piazza Buenos Aires 20, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Fabio BabiloniDept. of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Deep Blue (Italy) · ITÉcole Nationale de l’Aviation Civile · FRSapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITGirls Incorporated · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several models defining different types of cognitive human behaviour are available. For this work, we have selected the Skill, Rule and Knowledge (SRK) model proposed by Rasmussen in 1983. This model is currently broadly used in safety critical domains, such as the aviation. Nowadays, there are no tools able to assess at which level of cognitive control the operator is dealing with the considered task, that is if he/she is performing the task as an automated routine (skill level), as procedures-based activity (rule level), or as a problem-solving process (knowledge level). Several studies tried to model the SRK behaviours from a Human Factor perspective. Despite such studies, there are no evidences in which such behaviours have been evaluated from a neurophysiological point of view, for example, by considering brain activity variations across the different SRK levels. Therefore, the proposed study aimed to investigate the use of neurophysiological signals to assess the cognitive control behaviours accordingly to the SRK taxonomy. The results of the study, performed on 37 professional Air Traffic Controllers, demonstrated that specific brain features could characterize and discriminate the different SRK levels, therefore enabling an objective assessment of the degree of cognitive control behaviours in realistic settings.

Indexed as

AviationBehavior ControlCognitionElectroencephalographyOccupationsTask Performance and AnalysisAnalysis of VarianceArousalBrainHumansKnowledgeMachine LearningProblem Solving

Identifiers

PMID28373684
PMCPMC5428823
OpenAlexW2600719567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.