Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373569›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Parietal neurons encode expected gains in instrumental information.

Nicholas C Foley, Simon P Kelly, Himanshu Mhatre, Manuel Lopes, Jacqueline Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prediction and Prioritisation: How Reward Learning Shapes Attentional Capture.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural Representations of Sensory Uncertainty and Confidence Are Associated with Perceptual Curiosity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas C FoleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Simon P KellyDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Himanshu MhatreDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Manuel LopesINRIA, 33405 Talence, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-8974
Jacqueline GottliebDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032; jg2141@columbia.edu.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
Vision Sciences Training GrantT32EY013933 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Carol A. Mason, CAROL M TROY · 2001 to 2026
$5.3M
Translational Neuroscience Training Grant.T32MH015174 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DENNY, CHRISTINE ANN · 1985 to 2020
$4.0M
Attentional control by uncertainty and reward: parietal and frontal mechanismsR01MH098039 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOTTLIEB, JACQUELINE · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Instrument development &fabrication for vision researchR24EY015634 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R24 EY015634NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013933NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098039NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural behavior, animals have access to multiple sources of information, but only a few of these sources are relevant for learning and actions. Beyond choosing an appropriate action, making good decisions entails the ability to choose the relevant information, but fundamental questions remain about the brain's information sampling policies. Recent studies described the neural correlates of seeking information about a reward, but it remains unknown whether, and how, neurons encode choices of instrumental information, in contexts in which the information guides subsequent actions. Here we show that parietal cortical neurons involved in oculomotor decisions encode, before an information sampling saccade, the reduction in uncertainty that the saccade is expected to bring for a subsequent action. These responses were distinct from the neurons' visual and saccadic modulations and from signals of expected reward or reward prediction errors. Therefore, even in an instrumental context when information and reward gains are closely correlated, individual cells encode decision variables that are based on informational factors and can guide the active sampling of action-relevant cues.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAction PotentialsAnimalsChoice BehaviorMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsParietal LobePhotic StimulationRewardattentiondecisionsinformation samplingrewardsaccades

Identifiers

PMID28373569
PMCPMC5402436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.