Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373295›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2017

Proteomic Analysis of Regulatory T Cells Reveals the Importance of Themis1 in the Control of Their Suppressive Function.

Fanny Duguet, Marie Locard-Paulet, Marlène Marcellin, Karima Chaoui, Isabelle Bernard, Olivier Andreoletti, Renaud Lesourne, Odile Burlet-Schiltz, Anne Gonzalez de Peredo, Abdelhadi Saoudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting T regulatory (TCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fanny DuguetFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France.
Marie Locard-PauletFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France.
Marlène MarcellinFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France.
Karima ChaouiFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France.
Isabelle Bernard§Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UPS, 31024, Toulouse, France.
Olivier Andreoletti¶UMR INRA ENVT 1225, Interactions Hôtes Agents Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Renaud Lesourne§Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UPS, 31024, Toulouse, France.
Odile Burlet-SchiltzFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France.
Anne Gonzalez de PeredoFrom the ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, 31077 Toulouse, France; gonzalez@ipbs.fre-mail.
Abdelhadi Saoudi§Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UPS, 31024, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Treg) represent a minor subpopulation of T lymphocytes that is crucial for the maintenance of immune homeostasis. Here, we present a large-scale quantitative mass spectrometry study that defines a specific proteomic "signature" of Treg. Treg and conventional T lymphocyte (Tconv) subpopulations were sorted by flow cytometry and subjected to global proteomic analysis by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS on a fast-sequencing Q-Exactive mass spectrometer. Besides "historical" proteins that characterize Treg, our study identified numerous new proteins that are up- or downregulated in Treg

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceAnimalsChromatography, LiquidDisease Models, AnimalFlow CytometryHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProteinsProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsthemis protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID28373295
PMCPMC5546195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.