Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373199›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) in the Treatment of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Gram-Positive Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

William O'Riordan, Courtney Tiffany, Nicole Scangarella-Oman, Caroline Perry, Mohammad Hossain, Teri Ashton, Etienne Dumont

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William O'RiordaneStudySite, San Diego, California, USA.
Courtney TiffanyGlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA Courtney.A.Tiffany@gsk.com Etienne.f.dumont@gsk.com.
Nicole Scangarella-OmanGlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Caroline PerryGlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mohammad HossainGlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Teri AshtonGlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Etienne DumontGlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA Courtney.A.Tiffany@gsk.com Etienne.f.dumont@gsk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gepotidacin is a novel, first-in-class, triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial agent which has

Indexed as

AcenaphthenesAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleGram-Positive BacteriaHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin Diseases, BacterialAcenaphthenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsgepotidacinHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingABSSSIantibacterial agentantimicrobial safetyefficacygepotidacinphase 2 studyskin infections

Identifiers

PMID28373199
PMCPMC5444153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.