Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28373155›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

Processes and Recommendations for Creating mHealth Apps for Low-Income Populations.

Laura Siga Stephan, Eduardo Dytz Almeida, Raphael Boesche Guimaraes, Antonio Gaudie Ley, Rodrigo Gonçalves Mathias, Maria Valéria Assis, Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mobile Health Interventions for Substance Use Disorders.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Siga StephanInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-4276
Eduardo Dytz AlmeidaInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-9875
Raphael Boesche GuimaraesInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-828X
Antonio Gaudie LeyInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-2101
Rodrigo Gonçalves MathiasMR Apps, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1954-1232
Maria Valéria AssisAalto University, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-831X
Tiago Luiz Luz LeiriaInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-102X
Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia · BRAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health (mHealth) apps have shown to improve health indicators, but concerns remain about the inclusion of populations from low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) in these new technologies. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a chronic condition with a challenging management. Previous studies have shown socioeconomic differences in the prescription of anticoagulant treatment and shared decision strategies are encouraged to achieve better outcomes. mHealth can aid both doctors and patients in this matter.

objectiveWe describe the development of an mHealth app (aFib) idealized to aid shared decision between doctor and patient about anticoagulation prophylaxis in AF in a low-income and low-literacy population in Brazil. On the basis of our research, we suggest the processes to be followed when developing mHealth apps in this context.

methodsA multidisciplinary team collected information about the target population and its needs and detected the best opportunity to insert the app in their current health care. Literature about the subject was reviewed and important data were selected to be delivered through good navigability, easy terminology, and friendly design. The app was evaluated in a multimethod setting.

resultsThe steps suggested to develop an mHealth app target to LMIC are: (1) characterize the problem and the target user, (2) review the literature, (3) translate information to knowledge, (4) protect information, and (5) evaluate usability and efficacy.

conclusionsWe expect that these recommendations can guide the development of new mHealth apps in LMIC, on a scientific basis.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationlow-income populationmHealth

Identifiers

PMID28373155
PMCPMC5394264
OpenAlexW2604577243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.