Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28372890›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2017

Performance evaluation of the point-of-care INSTI™ HIV-1/2 antibody test in early and established HIV infections.

Sarah Adams, Wei Luo, Laura Wesolowski, Stephanie E Cohen, Philip J Peters, S Michele Owen, Silvina Masciotra

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-volume hemacytometer.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Performance evaluation of the MedMira reveal G4 LAB S/P and POC HIV antibody rapid screening tests using plasma and whole blood specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Performance evaluation of four point-of-care HIV tests using unprocessed specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah AdamsDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Wei LuoDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Laura WesolowskiDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Stephanie E CohenSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Philip J PetersDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
S Michele OwenDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Silvina MasciotraDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: Svm6@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe flow-through INSTI™ HIV-1/HIV-2 Rapid Antibody (INSTI) test is a 60s FDA-approved test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody testing using whole blood and plasma.

objectiveWe evaluated the performance of INSTI using plasma and simulated whole blood specimens. STUDY

designINSTI's performance in plasma specimens from commercial seroconversion panels was assessed by estimating the relative sensitivity using a 50% cumulative frequency analysis and by comparing its performance with other FDA-approved rapid tests (RTs). INSTI was further evaluated using 320 HIV-1 plasma specimens collected during a cross-sectional study and with 107 HIV-1 and 24 HIV-2 simulated whole blood specimens. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using 615 known HIV-1 group M/O and 80 HIV-2 (Western blot (WB)-positive), and 497 HIV-negative plasma specimens, respectively.

resultsIn HIV-1 seroconversion panels, INSTI became reactive 9days before a positive WB. When compared to FDA-approved antibody-based lateral flow RTs, INSTI detected significantly more early infections. Among HIV-1-infected cross-sectional plasma samples, INSTI detected 23 (27%) of 85 Architect-positive/Multispot-negative or indeterminate specimens. For plasma specimens, the sensitivity was 99.84% for HIV-1 and 100% for HIV-2, and the specificity was 99.80%. Using simulated whole blood from seroconverters, INSTI performed similarly to plasma.

conclusionsINSTI performed significantly better than antibody-based lateral flow RTs during early stages of seroconversion. Sensitivity and specificity were within the manufacturer's reported ranges. Considering the observed test performance and the almost immediate results, INSTI is an accurate option to detect HIV-1/HIV-2 antibodies in point-of-care settings where lab testing is not feasible.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisPoint-of-Care SystemsAlgorithmsBlotting, WesternCross-Sectional StudiesHIV-1HIV-2HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityHIV AntibodiesCLIA-waived testEarly HIV-1 infectionsHIV-1/2 rapid testWhole blood testing

Identifiers

PMID28372890
PMCPMC11175659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.