Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28372674›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical anesthesia2017

The sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyun Jung Kim, Woo Jong Shin, Suin Park, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Jae Hoon Oh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05192629 (Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine to Oral Midazolam as Premedication for Propofol Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05192629 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine to Oral Midazolam as Premedication for Propofol Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrugmann University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled250ConditionsMRI, Pediatric Sedation, Midazolam, DexmedetomidineArmsDexmedetomidine, Midazolam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effective and safe pediatric sedation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Woo Jong ShinDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: swj0208@hanyang.ac.kr.
Suin ParkDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeong Sik AhnDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Hoon OhDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hanyang University · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveAdministration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation is comfortable and effective in children who are afraid of needles, and it offers efficient sedation similar to that of intravenous administration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of the pre-procedural administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine.

designWe identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intranasal dexmedetomidine administration to other administration methods of various sedatives or placebo from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, KoreaMed and hand searches of trial registries.

settingPediatrics who underwent interventional procedures and surgeries. PATIENTS: Children under the age of 18.

interventionsStudies were included if they were compatible with the criteria that dexmedetomidine was administered intranasally. MEASUREMENTS: We pooled data on the sedation status as the primary outcome and considered the behavioral score, blood pressure, heart rate and side effects to be secondary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. MAIN

resultsThis meta-analysis included 11 RCTs. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was -2.45 (random, 95% CI; -3.33, -1.58) for continuous outcomes and RR of unsatisfactory patient outcome was 0.42 (M-H, random 95% CI; 0.26, 0.68 I

conclusionsThis review suggests that intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with better sedative effects than oral benzodiazepines without producing respiratory depression, but it had a significantly delayed onset of effects.

Indexed as

Administration, BuccalAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, OralAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAnesthesiaBenzodiazepinesBlood PressureChildDexmedetomidineHeart RateHumansHypnotics and SedativesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory InsufficiencyTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsBenzodiazepinesDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesDexmedetomidineIntranasalMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialsSedationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28372674
OpenAlexW2575046062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.