Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28372544›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2017

Prevalence of GMC performance assessments in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort analysis by country of medical qualification.

L Mehdizadeh, H W W Potts, A Sturrock, J Dacre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L MehdizadehUniversity College London Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, room GF/664, Hampstead, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
H W W PottsUCL Institute of Health Informatics, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK. h.potts@ucl.ac.uk.
A SturrockUniversity College London Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, room GF/664, Hampstead, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
J DacreRoyal College of Physicians, 11 St Andrews Place, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4LE, UK.
University College London · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demographics of doctors working in the UK are changing. The United Kingdom (UK) has voted to leave the European Union (EU) and there is heightened political discourse around the world about the impact of migration on healthcare services. Previous work suggests that foreign trained doctors perform worse than UK graduates in postgraduate medical examinations. We analysed the prevalence by country of primary medical qualification of doctors who were required to take an assessment by the General Medical Council (GMC) because of performance concerns.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort analysis of data routinely collected by the GMC. We compared doctors who had a GMC performance assessment between 1996 and 2013 with the medical register in the same period. The outcome measures were numbers experiencing performance assessments by country or region of medical qualification.

resultsThe rate of performance assessment varied significantly by place of medical qualification and by year; χ

conclusionsThe rate of performance assessment varies significantly by place of medical qualification. This is the first study to explore the risk of performance assessment by individual places of medical qualification. While concern has largely focused on the competence of non-EEA, International Medical Graduates, we discuss implications for how to ensure European trained doctors are fit to practise before their medical licence in the UK is granted. Further research is needed to investigate whether these country effects hold true when controlling for factors like doctors' sex, age, length of time working in the UK, and English language skills. This will allow evidence-based decisions to be made around the regulatory environment the UK should adopt once it leaves the EU. Patients should be reassured that the vast majority of all doctors working in the UK are competent.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementForeign Medical GraduatesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical CompetenceEuropean UnionFemaleHumansLicensureMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomYoung AdultBrexitCohort studyGeneral Medical CouncilPerformance assessmentPrimary medical qualification

Identifiers

PMID28372544
PMCPMC5379692
OpenAlexW2604721639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.