Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28372351›Full record

SynthesisJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2017

Frequency, Expected Effects, Obstacles, and Facilitators of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review.

Minsu Ock, So Yun Lim, Min-Woo Jo, Sang-Il Lee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the development of safety culture among physicians with text mining of patient safety reports: a retrospective study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  5. Qualitative case study on the disability acceptance experiences of soldiers with disabilities.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Open disclosure.BJA education · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minsu OckDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9949-9224
So Yun LimDepartment of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-3718
Min-Woo JoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-1318
Sang-Il LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1068-7542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe performed a systematic review to assess and aggregate the available evidence on the frequency, expected effects, obstacles, and facilitators of disclosure of patient safety incidents (DPSI).

methodsWe used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for this systematic review and searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for English articles published between 1990 and 2014. Two authors independently conducted the title screening and abstract review. Ninety-nine articles were selected for full-text reviews. One author extracted the data and another verified them.

resultsThere was considerable variation in the reported frequency of DPSI among medical professionals. The main expected effects of DPSI were decreased intention of the general public to file medical lawsuits and punish medical professionals, increased credibility of medical professionals, increased intention of patients to revisit and recommend physicians or hospitals, higher ratings of quality of care, and alleviation of feelings of guilt among medical professionals. The obstacles to DPSI were fear of medical lawsuits and punishment, fear of a damaged professional reputation among colleagues and patients, diminished patient trust, the complexity of the situation, and the absence of a patient safety culture. However, the factors facilitating DPSI included the creation of a safe environment for reporting patient safety incidents, as well as guidelines and education for DPSI.

conclusionsThe reported frequency of the experience of the general public with DPSI was somewhat lower than the reported frequency of DPSI among medical professionals. Although we identified various expected effects of DPSI, more empirical evidence from real cases is required.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyDatabases, FactualHumansMedical ErrorsPhysiciansDisclosure of patient safety incidentsMedical errorsPatient safetySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28372351
PMCPMC5398338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.