Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28372092›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2017

Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Morteza Khaleghi, Sunil Puria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Mouse middle-ear forward and reverse acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morteza KhaleghiEarlens Corporation, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Sunil PuriaEaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USMenlo School · US

Funding

Why do mammals have a flexible three-bone ossicular chain?R01DC005960 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEELE, CHARLES RICHARD · 2004 to 2018
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microphone placement behind the pinna, which minimizes feedback but also reduces perception of the high-frequency pinna cues needed for sound localization, is one reason why hearing-aid users often complain of poor sound quality and difficulty understanding speech in noisy situations. In this paper, two strategies are investigated for minimizing the feedback pressure (thereby increasing the maximum stable gain, MSG) of a wide-bandwidth light-activated contact hearing aid (CHA) to facilitate microphone placement in the ear canal (EC): (1) changing the location of the drive force and its direction at the umbo, and (2) placing an acoustic damper within the EC to reduce the feedback pressure at the microphone location. The MSG and equivalent pressure output (EPO) are calculated in a 3D finite element model of a human middle ear based on micro computed tomography (micro-CT) images. The model calculations indicate that changing the umbo-force direction can decrease feedback pressure, but at the expense of decreased EPO. However the model shows improvements in MSG without sacrificing EPO when an acoustic damper is placed in the EC. This was verified through benchtop experimentation and in human cadaver temporal bones. The results pave the path towards a wide-bandwidth hearing aid that incorporates an EC-microphone design.

Indexed as

AcousticsHearingHearing AidsLasersMechanotransduction, CellularAuditory PerceptionEar, MiddleEquipment DesignFeedbackFinite Element AnalysisHumansModels, AnatomicPressureTemporal BoneX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID28372092
PMCPMC5848864
OpenAlexW2593501265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.