Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28371832›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Timed sequential therapy of the selective T-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil and temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Matthias Holdhoff, Xiaobu Ye, Jeffrey G Supko, Louis B Nabors, Arati S Desai, Tobias Walbert, Glenn J Lesser, William L Read, Frank S Lieberman, Martin A Lodge and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01480050 (A Phase I Open Label Safety Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profile and Tolerance of Mibefradil Dose Finding in Subjects With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Undergoing Standard, Repeated Temozolomide Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01480050 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Open Label Safety Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profile and Tolerance of Mibefradil Dose Finding in Subjects With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Undergoing Standard, Repeated Temozolomide Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsRan2012 to 2017Enrolled28ConditionsBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsArmstemozolomide, 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine, pharmacological study, Mibefradil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Calcium channels as pharmacological targets for cancer therapy.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Blockade of CaBritish journal of pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. The L-type calcium channel CaV1.3: A potential target for cancer therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. T-Type Calcium Channels: A Mixed Blessing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Treatment: Current Progress and Future Challenges.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias HoldhoffSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Xiaobu YeSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey G SupkoMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Louis B NaborsUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Arati S DesaiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tobias WalbertHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Glenn J LesserWake Forest University, School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
William L ReadEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Frank S LiebermanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Martin A LodgeJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey LealJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joy D FisherSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Serena DesideriSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stuart A GrossmanSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Richard L WahlWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
David SchiffUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USEmory University · USHenry Ford Health System · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Virginia Medical Center · USWake Forest University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)UM1CA137443 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSMAN, STUART A · 2014 to 2020
$9.7M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA137443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mibefradil (MIB), previously approved for treatment of hypertension, is a selective T-type calcium channel blocker with preclinical activity in high-grade gliomas (HGGs). To exploit its presumed mechanism of impacting cell cycle activity (G1 arrest), we designed a phase I study to determine safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MIB when given sequentially with temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent (r)HGG. Methods: Adult patients with rHGG ≥3 months from TMZ for initial therapy received MIB in 4 daily doses (q.i.d.) for 7 days followed by standard TMZ at 150-200 mg/m2 for 5 days per 28-day cycle. MIB dose escalation followed a modified 3 + 3 design, with an extension cohort of 10 patients at MTD who underwent 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET imaging, to image proliferation before and after 7 days of MIB. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (20 World Health Organization grade IV, 7 grade III; median age 50 y; median KPS 90). The MTD of MIB was 87.5 mg p.o. q.i.d. Dose-limiting toxicities were elevation of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (grade 3) and sinus bradycardia. The steady-state maximum plasma concentration of MIB at the MTD was 1693 ± 287 ng/mL (mean ± SD). 18F-FLT PET imaging showed a significant decline in standardized uptake value (SUV) signal in 2 of 10 patients after 7 days of treatment with MIB. Conclusions: MIB followed by TMZ was well tolerated in rHGG patients at the MTD. The lack of toxicity and presence of some responses in this selected patient population suggest that this regimen warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCalcium Channels, T-TypeDacarbazineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMibefradilMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingCalcium Channels, T-TypeDacarbazineMibefradilTemozolomideanaplastic gliomaglioblastomamibefradiltemozolomidetimed sequential therapy

Identifiers

PMID28371832
PMCPMC5464434
OpenAlexW2599365483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.