ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2017
A microfluidic platform for drug screening in a 3D cancer microenvironment.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization and evaluation of a novel polylactic acid-made bioreactor for large-scale adherent cell expansion.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cell-embedded microgels as emerging miniature 3D tissue-mimics toward biochip-based toxicity screening.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Prostate Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: A Review on CAF Functions, Heterogeneity, Resistance Mechanisms, and Future in a Chip.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinting and Microfluidic-based Devices for Cancer Detection and Drug Treatment: Focus on Prostate Cancer.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Microfluidics-Based Technologies for the Assessment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cells · 2024Review
- The progressive trend of modeling and drug screening systems of breast cancer bone metastasis.Journal of biological engineering · 2024Review
- Microphysiological systems as models for immunologically 'cold' tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Experimental in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models in prostate cancer research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Microfluidic Biosensor-Based Devices for Rapid Diagnosis and Effective Anti-cancer Therapeutic Monitoring for Breast Cancer Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Review
- A comparative study of tumour-on-chip models with patient-derived xenografts for predicting chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Going with the Flow: Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment Using Microfluidic Technology.Cancers · 2021Review
- Flexible Materials for High-Resolution 3D Printing of Microfluidic Devices with Integrated Droplet Size Regulation.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
- Tumor Chemosensitivity Assays Are Helpful for Personalized Cytotoxic Treatments in Cancer Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- [Research advances of high-throughput cell-based drug screening systems based on microfluidic technique].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2021Review
- Multifunctional microfluidic chip for cancer diagnosis and treatment.Nanotheranostics · 2021Review
- Organotypic Models in Drug Development "Tumor Models and Cancer Systems Biology for the Investigation of Anticancer Drugs and Resistance Development".Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021Article
- Application of an open-chamber multi-channel microfluidic device to test chemotherapy drugs.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Recent Advances in Monitoring Cell Behavior Using Cell-Based Impedance Spectroscopy.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Label-Free Bioelectrochemical Methods for Evaluation of Anticancer Drug Effects at a Molecular Level.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Recent advances in microfluidics for drug screening.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Development of resistance to chemotherapy treatments is a major challenge in the battle against cancer. Although a vast repertoire of chemotherapeutics is currently available for treating cancer, a technique for rapidly identifying the right drug based on the chemo-resistivity of the cancer cells is not available and it currently takes weeks to months to evaluate the response of cancer patients to a drug. A sensitive, low-cost diagnostic assay capable of rapidly evaluating the effect of a series of drugs on cancer cells can significantly change the paradigm in cancer treatment management. Integration of microfluidics and electrical sensing modality in a 3D tumour microenvironment may provide a powerful platform to tackle this issue. Here, we report a 3D microfluidic platform that could be potentially used for a real-time deterministic analysis of the success rate of a chemotherapeutic drug in less than 12h. The platform (66mm×50mm; L×W) is integrated with the microsensors (interdigitated gold electrodes with width and spacing 10µm) that can measure the change in the electrical response of cancer cells seeded in a 3D extra cellular matrix when a chemotherapeutic drug is flown next to the matrix. B16-F10 mouse melanoma, 4T1 mouse breast cancer, and DU 145 human prostate cancer cells were used as clinical models. The change in impedance magnitude on flowing chemotherapeutics drugs measured at 12h for drug-susceptible and drug tolerant breast cancer cells compared to control were 50,552±144 Ω and 28,786±233 Ω, respectively, while that of drug-susceptible melanoma cells were 40,197±222 Ω and 4069±79 Ω, respectively. In case of prostate cancer the impedance change between susceptible and resistant cells were 8971±1515 Ω and 3281±429 Ω, respectively, which demonstrated that the microfluidic platform was capable of delineating drug susceptible cells, drug tolerant, and drug resistant cells in less than 12h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.