Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28371726›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2017

Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data.

T Douglas, J Pugh, I Singh, J Savulescu, S Fazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Improving risk assessment in forensic mental health: Temporal validation and clinical refinement of the FoVOx risk tool.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Facilitating a safe and caring atmosphere in everyday life in forensic mental health wards - a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Case-Study of Filicide in an Italian Woman.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T DouglasOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, United Kingdom.
J PughOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, United Kingdom.
I SinghOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
J SavulescuOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, United Kingdom.
S FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: seena.fazel@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 086041Wellcome Trust 095806Wellcome Trust 100705Wellcome Trust 100705/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 104848Wellcome Trust 104848/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 202836/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Violence risk assessment tools are increasingly used within criminal justice and forensic psychiatry, however there is little relevant, reliable and unbiased data regarding their predictive accuracy. We argue that such data are needed to (i) prevent excessive reliance on risk assessment scores, (ii) allow matching of different risk assessment tools to different contexts of application, (iii) protect against problematic forms of discrimination and stigmatisation, and (iv) ensure that contentious demographic variables are not prematurely removed from risk assessment tools.

Indexed as

CrimeCriminal LawForensic PsychiatryHumansMental DisordersRisk AssessmentViolenceCrime predictionEthics and human rightsForensic psychiatryRacial profilingRisk assessmentViolence

Identifiers

PMID28371726
PMCPMC5408162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.