ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2017
Effect of Femoral Component Flexion Implantation on the Mediolateral Bone-prosthetic Fit in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sagittal femoral morphology is not associated with coronal alignment phenotypes: A radiographic analysis from the Brescia Knee Research Group.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 2: Combined flexion does not affect outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 1: Variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Influence of Femoral Component Flexion on Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Preoperative radiographic parameters in the case of using a narrow-version femoral implant in total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019Article
- Flexed femoral component improves kinematics and biomechanical effect in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- Flexing and downsizing the femoral component is not detrimental to patellofemoral biomechanics in posterior-referencing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFemoral component overhang in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported in previous studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral component flexion implantation on mediolateral bone-prosthetic fit in TKA.
methodsVirtual prosthesis implantations were performed on computed tomographic models of 10 Chinese knees with femoral prostheses of the Advance Medial-Pivot knee system (MicroPort Orthopedics, Arlington, TN, USA), with the femoral component positioned at 0°, 3°, or 6° of flexion in the sagittal plane. For each degree of flexion implantation, the differences between the knee and femoral component models on the lateral and medial sides at trochlea (zone 1), anterior-distal condyle (zone 2), posterior-distal condyle (zone 3), and posterior condyle (zone 4) were measured. Positive difference values indicate component overhang, and negative difference values indicate component underhang. The values of component overhang (underhang) in each zone were statistically analyzed across the 3° of flexion implantation.
resultsWith a greater degree of flexion implantation, overhang was reduced and even changed to underhang. With 0° of flexion implantation, an overhang exceeding 3 mm existed mainly on the medial side of zone 1 (5.81 mm) and the lateral side of zone 2 (3.39 mm). With 3° of flexion, overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed only on the medial side of zone 1 (3.10 mm), and underhang was observed only on the medial side of zone 4 (-0.32 mm). No overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed for 6° of flexion, while underhang was observed except on the lateral sides of zone 2 (1.32 mm) and zone 4 (1.10 mm) and on the medial side of zone 1 (1.54 mm). A significant difference in overhang values on the lateral and medial sides of zone 1 was observed between 0 and 6° of flexion (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe present study demonstrated that femoral component flexion implantation by 3° can reduce excessive overhang, although 3.10 mm of overhang remained at the medial side of zone 1. Conversely, 6° of flexion implantation can avoid 3 mm of overhang for any zone, but increases the risk of underhang. Slight flexion implantation may be an effective alternative technique to prevent excessive component overhang, especially in the trochlea and anterior region of the distal condyle, in Chinese patients with standard TKA prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.