ArticleCancer science2017
Intratumoral bidirectional transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal cells in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Eribulin on Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity in Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Cultures and Excised Tissues.Cancers · 2026Article
- An integrative phenotype-structured partial differential equation model for the population dynamics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Survival mechanisms of circulating tumor cells and their implications for cancer treatment.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- RIPK1-dependent necroptosis promotes vasculogenic mimicry formation via eIF4E in triple-negative breast cancer.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Epigenetic memory acquired during long-term EMT induction governs the recovery to the epithelial state.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Profiling and targeting cancer stem cell signaling pathways for cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Loss of SNAI1 induces cellular plasticity in invasive triple-negative breast cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Population Dynamics of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Heterogeneity in Cancer Cells.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Density-Dependent Migration Characteristics of Cancer Cells Driven by Pseudopod Interaction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Mapping Intellectual Structures and Research Hotspots of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Differences and similarities between cancer and somatic stem cells: therapeutic implications.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Review
- Actin cytoskeleton in mesenchymal-to-amoeboid transition of cancer cells.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020Review
- Controversies around epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019Review
- Multi-Omics Characterization of the Spontaneous Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition in the PMC42 Breast Cancer Cell Lines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Interrogation of Phenotypic Plasticity between Epithelial and Mesenchymal States in Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Phosphorylation state of SerCellular signalling · 2018Article
- Intratumoral bidirectional transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal cells in triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse process, mesenchymal-epithelial transition MET, are crucial in several stages of cancer metastasis. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition allows cancer cells to move to proximal blood vessels for intravasation. However, because EMT and MET processes are dynamic, mesenchymal cancer cells are likely to undergo MET transiently and subsequently re-undergo EMT to restart the metastatic process. Therefore, spatiotemporally coordinated mutual regulation between EMT and MET could occur during metastasis. To elucidate such regulation, we chose HCC38, a human triple-negative breast cancer cell line, because HCC38 is composed of epithelial and mesenchymal populations at a fixed ratio even though mesenchymal cells proliferate significantly more slowly than epithelial cells. We purified epithelial and mesenchymal cells from Venus-labeled and unlabeled HCC38 cells and mixed them at various ratios to follow EMT and MET. Using this system, we found that the efficiency of EMT is approximately an order of magnitude higher than that of MET and that the two populations significantly enhance the transition of cells from the other population to their own. In addition, knockdown of Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) or Zinc finger protein SNAI2 (SLUG) significantly suppressed EMT but promoted partial MET, indicating that ZEB1 and SLUG are crucial to EMT and MET. We also show that primary breast cancer cells underwent EMT that correlated with changes in expression profiles of genes determining EMT status and breast cancer subtype. These changes were very similar to those observed in EMT in HCC38 cells. Consequently, we propose HCC38 as a suitable model to analyze EMT-MET dynamics that could affect the development of triple-negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.