Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28370884›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2017

Detecting in vivo urokinase plasminogen activator activity with a catalyCEST MRI contrast agent.

Sanhita Sinharay, Christine M Howison, Amanda F Baker, Mark D Pagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanhita SinharayDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Christine M HowisonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Amanda F BakerUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mark D PagelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Detection of in vivo enzyme activities with CEST MRIR01CA169774 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CARDENAS-RODRIGUEZ, JULIO · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) promotes tumor invasion and metastasis. The monitoring of uPA activity using molecular imaging may have prognostic value and be predictive for response to anti-cancer therapies. However, the detection of in vivo enzyme activity with molecular imaging remains a challenge. To address this problem, we designed a nonmetallic contrast agent, GR-4Am-SA, that can be detected with chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. This agent has a peptide that is cleaved by uPA, which causes a CEST signal at 5.0 ppm to decrease, and also has a salicylic acid moiety that can produce a CEST signal at 9.5 ppm, which is largely unresponsive to enzyme activity. The two CEST signals were used to determine a reaction coordinate, representing the extent of enzyme-catalyzed cleavage of the GR-4Am-SA agent during an experimental study. Initial biochemical studies showed that GR-4Am-SA could detect uPA activity in reducing conditions. Subsequently, we used our catalyCEST MRI protocol with the agent to detect the uPA catalysis of GR-4Am-SA in a flank xenograft model of Capan-2 pancreatic cancer. The results showed an average reaction coordinate of 80% ± 8%, which was strongly dependent on the CEST signal at 5.0 ppm. The relative independence of the reaction coordinate on the CEST signal at 9.5 ppm showed that the detection of enzyme activity was largely independent of the concentration of GR-4Am-SA within the tumor tissue. These results demonstrated the advantages of a single CEST agent with biomarker-responsive and unresponsive signals for reliably assessing enzyme activity during in vivo cancer studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorContrast MediaEnzyme ActivationFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMice, NudeMolecular ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUrokinase-Type Plasminogen ActivatorBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaUrokinase-Type Plasminogen ActivatorCEST MRIenzyme activitypancreatic cancerurokinase plasminogen activator

Identifiers

PMID28370884
PMCPMC5704996
OpenAlexW2601646329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.