Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28370881›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2017

Applications for self-administered mobile cognitive assessments in clinical research: A systematic review.

Raeanne C Moore, Joel Swendsen, Colin A Depp

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05415306 (An Emoji-based Attention Bias Modification Intervention for Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05415306 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Emoji-based Attention Bias Modification Intervention for Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDepressive Symptoms, Mood DisordersArmsAttention Bias Modification, Deep-breathing training, Sham Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Computational Phenotyping of Cognitive Decline With Retest Learning.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A novel ecological momentary assessment app for the investigation of daily cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raeanne C MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-041X
Joel SwendsenNational Center for Scientific Research, University of Bordeaux, EPHE, Bordeaux, France.
Colin A DeppDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

Real-Time Mobile Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Serious Mental IllnessR01MH100417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEPP, COLIN A. · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
Real-Time Mobile Assessment of Daily Functioning Among Older HIV-Infected AdultsK23MH107260 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MOORE, RAEANNE CRISTINE · 2015 to 2018
$927k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH107260NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH104725NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequent, brief and repeated self-administered mobile assessments of cognitive function, conducted in everyday life settings, are a promising complementary tool to traditional assessment approaches. Mobile cognitive assessments promote patient-centered care and might enhance capacity to inform individual-level outcomes over time (i.e. detecting subtle declines in cognitive function), as well as in assessing cognition and its correlates in the naturalistic environment. The goal of this systematic review was to assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of mobile cognitive assessments. Through a comprehensive search, we identified 12 articles using self-administered, mobile phone-based cognitive assessments. Studies sampled participants between 1 and 6 times per day for 1-14 days. Samples ranged in age from 14 to 83 years old and were generally healthy populations without cognitive impairment. Working memory was the most frequently-assessed cognitive domain (n = 7), followed by attention/reaction time (n = 4). Seven studies reported adherence, with mean adherence rates of 79.2%. In addition to positive evidence of feasibility, there was general support for high levels of between- and within-person reliability and construct validity. While research has only begun to explore the utility of mobile cognitive assessments, studies to-date indicate they may be a promising complementary tool to traditional assessment methods with potential to improve clinical care and research.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adultcognitionecological momentary assessmentpatient-centered carerepeated samplingtechnology

Identifiers

PMID28370881
PMCPMC5623609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.