Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28370732›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017

The fluorescence intensities ratio is not a reliable parameter for evaluation of protein unfolding transitions.

Gabriel Žoldák, Daniel Jancura, Erik Sedlák

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. eSPC: an online data-analysis platform for molecular biophysics.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing and Improving Protein Sample Quality.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel ŽoldákDepartment of Biophysics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biophysics, Technische Universität München, Garching, D-85748, Germany.
Daniel JancuraDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, 04154, Slovakia.
Erik SedlákCentre for Interdisciplinary Biosciences, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, 04154, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the fluorescence of proteins, particularly the fluorescence of intrinsic tryptophan residues, is a popular method often used in the analysis of unfolding transitions (induced by temperature, chemical denaturant, and pH) in proteins. The tryptophan fluorescence provides several suitable parameters, such as steady-state fluorescence intensity, apparent quantum yield, mean fluorescence lifetime, position of emission maximum that are often utilized for the observation of the conformational/unfolding transitions of proteins. In addition, the fluorescence intensities ratio at different wavelengths (usually at 330 nm and 350 nm) is becoming an increasingly popular parameter for the evaluation of thermal transitions. We show that, under certain conditions, the use of this parameter for the analysis of unfolding transitions leads to the incorrect determination of thermodynamic parameters characterizing unfolding transitions in proteins (e.g., melting temperature) and, hence, can compromise the hit identification during high-throughput drug screening campaigns.

Indexed as

FluorescenceModels, ChemicalProtein UnfoldingHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProteinsTryptophanProteinsTryptophanintrinsic protein fluorescencemelting temperatureprotein denaturationtryptophan fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID28370732
PMCPMC5441425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.