Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28370351›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Statins and polyneuropathy revisited: case-control study in Denmark, 1999-2013.

Toke de Koning Svendsen, Peter Nørregaard Hansen, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez, Lene Andersen, Jesper Hallas, Søren Hein Sindrup, David Gaist

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Statins Neuromuscular Adverse Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Neuromuscular Complications of Statin Therapy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Drug-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Narrative Review.Current clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toke de Koning SvendsenDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Peter Nørregaard HansenDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Luis Alberto García RodríguezCentro Español de Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica (CEIFE), Madrid, Spain.
Lene AndersenDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper HallasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Søren Hein SindrupDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
David GaistDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKCentro Español de Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn a previous study, we found a positive association between statin use and polyneuropathy risk. Other studies reported equivocal results. The present study aimed to confirm our findings with a design similar to that used in our previous study but with a larger data set.

methodsWe searched medical registry data to identify patients diagnosed with incident polyneuropathy of no known cause (idiopathic polyneuropathy) between 1999 and 2013; we verified diagnoses through medical records. For each case, we recruited 20 general population controls with no previous history of polyneuropathy. Controls were matched to their respective case for age and gender. We ascertained the prior statin use of cases and controls through a prescription registry. Based on this information, exposure to statins was categorized into 'ever use' or 'never use'. Ever use of statins was classified by how recently they had been used ('current use' or 'past use'); current use was further classified into long-term use (5+ years) and high- or low-intensity use. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine associations between polyneuropathy and statin use.

resultsWe included 370 validated cases and 7400 controls. Ever use of statins was not associated with an elevated risk of polyneuropathy (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84, 1.54). Similarly, we found no associations between polyneuropathy risk and current use (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79, 1.53), long-term use (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66, 1.92) or high-intensity statin use (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.59, 1.84).

conclusionStatin use was not associated with an increased risk of idiopathic polyneuropathy.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPolyneuropathiesRegistriesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsadverse effectscase-control studyepidemiologypolyneuropathyrisk factorsstatin

Identifiers

PMID28370351
PMCPMC5555863
OpenAlexW2605046385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.