Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369781›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2017

A big data approach to the development of mixed-effects models for seizure count data.

Joseph J Tharayil, Sharon Chiang, Robert Moss, John M Stern, William H Theodore, Daniel M Goldenholz

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. State Space Modeling of Event Count Time Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph J TharayilClinical Epilepsy Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-4104
Sharon ChiangDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Robert MossAlexandria, Virginia, U.S.A.
John M SternUniversity of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
William H TheodoreClinical Epilepsy Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Daniel M GoldenholzClinical Epilepsy Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-2758

Funding

Physiologic And Pharmacologic Studies In EpilepsyZIANS002236 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI THEODORE, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2020
$14.2M
Training Program in Biostatistics for Cancer ResearchT32CA096520 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KIMMEL, MAREK, YUAN, YING · 2003 to 2023
$4.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to develop a generalized linear mixed model for predicting seizure count that is useful in the design and analysis of clinical trials. This model also may benefit the design and interpretation of seizure-recording paradigms. Most existing seizure count models do not include children, and there is currently no consensus regarding the most suitable model that can be applied to children and adults. Therefore, an additional objective was to develop a model that accounts for both adult and pediatric epilepsy.

methodsUsing data from SeizureTracker.com, a patient-reported seizure diary tool with >1.2 million recorded seizures across 8 years, we evaluated the appropriateness of Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated negative binomial, and modified negative binomial models for seizure count data based on minimization of the Bayesian information criterion. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to account for demographic and etiologic covariates and for autocorrelation structure. Holdout cross-validation was used to evaluate predictive accuracy in simulating seizure frequencies.

resultsFor both adults and children, we found that a negative binomial model with autocorrelation over 1 day was optimal. Using holdout cross-validation, the proposed model was found to provide accurate simulation of seizure counts for patients with up to four seizures per day. SIGNIFICANCE: The optimal model can be used to generate more realistic simulated patient data with very few input parameters. The availability of a parsimonious, realistic virtual patient model can be of great utility in simulations of phase II/III clinical trials, epilepsy monitoring units, outpatient biosensors, and mobile Health (mHealth) applications.

Indexed as

BiomarkersData MiningLinear ModelsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBayes TheoremChildElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansModels, StatisticalSoftwareSpatial AnalysisBiomarkersClinical trial simulationEpilepsyGeneralized linear mixed-effects modeling

Identifiers

PMID28369781
PMCPMC5429882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.