ArticleEpilepsia2017
A big data approach to the development of mixed-effects models for seizure count data.
Article in Epilepsia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of components included in published societal perspective or QALY outcome economic analyses for antiepileptic drug treatment in chronic epilepsy.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2018Pooled it
- Monitoring Antiseizure Medication Change Using Ultra Long-Term Electroencephalogram: A Multicenter Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Patterns of seizure frequency reduction in clinical trial participants with lower baseline seizure frequency.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- L-Relationship between uncertainty and average seizure frequency in clinical trials of antiseizure medications.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Epilepsy Detection: Balancing Effectiveness With Ethical Considerations for Welfare.Health science reports · 2025Article
- State Space Modeling of Event Count Time Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- BAYESIAN NON-HOMOGENEOUS HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL WITH VARIABLE SELECTION FOR INVESTIGATING DRIVERS OF SEIZURE RISK CYCLING.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Flexible realistic simulation of seizure occurrence recapitulating statistical properties of seizure diaries.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Seizure count forecasting to aid diagnostic testing in epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- A Review on Machine Learning Approaches in Identification of Pediatric Epilepsy.SN computer science · 2022Article
- Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.Epilepsy research · 2020Article
- Prospective validation study of an epilepsy seizure risk system for outpatient evaluation.Epilepsia · 2020Article
- Severity Assessment in CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.Pediatric neurology · 2019Review
- Characteristics of large patient-reported outcomes: Where can one million seizures get us?Epilepsia open · 2018Article
- Common data elements for epilepsy mobile health systems.Epilepsia · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur objective was to develop a generalized linear mixed model for predicting seizure count that is useful in the design and analysis of clinical trials. This model also may benefit the design and interpretation of seizure-recording paradigms. Most existing seizure count models do not include children, and there is currently no consensus regarding the most suitable model that can be applied to children and adults. Therefore, an additional objective was to develop a model that accounts for both adult and pediatric epilepsy.
methodsUsing data from SeizureTracker.com, a patient-reported seizure diary tool with >1.2 million recorded seizures across 8 years, we evaluated the appropriateness of Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated negative binomial, and modified negative binomial models for seizure count data based on minimization of the Bayesian information criterion. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to account for demographic and etiologic covariates and for autocorrelation structure. Holdout cross-validation was used to evaluate predictive accuracy in simulating seizure frequencies.
resultsFor both adults and children, we found that a negative binomial model with autocorrelation over 1 day was optimal. Using holdout cross-validation, the proposed model was found to provide accurate simulation of seizure counts for patients with up to four seizures per day. SIGNIFICANCE: The optimal model can be used to generate more realistic simulated patient data with very few input parameters. The availability of a parsimonious, realistic virtual patient model can be of great utility in simulations of phase II/III clinical trials, epilepsy monitoring units, outpatient biosensors, and mobile Health (mHealth) applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.