Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369740›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2017

Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Nursing Homes: "Call the Family Instead of Calling the Ambulance".

Andrew B Cohen, M Tish Knobf, Terri R Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Paramedics' Perspectives on the Hospital Transfers of Nursing Home Residents-A Qualitative Focus Group Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew B CohenDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
M Tish KnobfDivision of Acute Care/Health Systems, Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Terri R FriedDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Yale Training Program in Geriatric Clinical Epidemiology and Aging-Related ResearchT32AG019134 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Terri R. Fried · 2001 to 2026
$7.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS T32 AG019134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine how do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders are interpreted and used in nursing homes (NHs) once they are in place.

designQualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews performed from December 2013 to April 2014.

settingEight skilled nursing facilities in Connecticut that ranked in the top 10% or bottom 10% in hospitalization rates from 2008 to 2010.

participantsNursing facility staff members (N = 31). MEASUREMENTS: A multidisciplinary team performed qualitative content analysis. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and identify themes.

resultsDNH orders were uncommon at low- and high-hospitalizing facilities. Participants reported that they did not interpret these orders literally. A DNH order was not a prohibition against hospitalization but was understood to have a variety of exceptions. These orders functioned primarily as a signal that hospitalization should be questioned and discussed with the family when an acute event occurred.

conclusionIn-the-moment discussions about hospitalization are still necessary even when a DNH order is in place. Work to reduce potentially burdensome NH-hospital transfers needs to focus not just on eliciting preferences in advance, but also on preparing residents and their families to make the best decisions about hospitalization when the time comes.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdultAdvance DirectivesConnecticutFamilyFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesQualitative ResearchTerminal Careadvance directivesclinical decision-makinghospitalizationnursing homesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28369740
PMCPMC5507729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.