Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369583›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Substrate preference of Gen endonucleases highlights the importance of branched structures as DNA damage repair intermediates.

Stephanie P Bellendir, Danielle J Rognstad, Lydia P Morris, Grzegorz Zapotoczny, William G Walton, Matthew R Redinbo, Dale A Ramsden, Jeff Sekelsky, Dorothy A Erie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA Holliday Junction: History, Regulation and Bioactivity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie P BellendirCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Danielle J RognstadCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Lydia P MorrisLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Grzegorz ZapotocznyCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
William G WaltonDepartment of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Matthew R RedinboDepartment of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Dale A RamsdenCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Jeff SekelskyCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Dorothy A ErieDepartment of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Mechanisms of Meiotic and Mitotic RecombinationR35GM118127 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JEFF J. SEKELSKY · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
NRSA IN GENETICST32GM007092 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 1985 to 2019
$5.9M
Structure Function Studies of DNA Mismatch RepairR01GM079480 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ERIE, DOROTHY A · 2007 to 2017
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079480NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118127NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human GEN1 and yeast Yen1 are endonucleases with the ability to cleave Holliday junctions (HJs), which are proposed intermediates in recombination. In vivo, GEN1 and Yen1 function secondarily to Mus81, which has weak activity on intact HJs. We show that the genetic relationship is reversed in Drosophila, with Gen mutants having more severe defects than mus81 mutants. In vitro, DmGen, like HsGEN1, efficiently cleaves HJs, 5΄ flaps, splayed arms, and replication fork structures. We find that the cleavage rates for 5΄ flaps are significantly higher than those for HJs for both DmGen and HsGEN1, even in vast excess of enzyme over substrate. Kinetic studies suggest that the difference in cleavage rates results from a slow, rate-limiting conformational change prior to HJ cleavage: formation of a productive dimer on the HJ. Despite the stark difference in vivo that Drosophila uses Gen over Mus81 and humans use MUS81 over GEN1, we find the in vitro activities of DmGen and HsGEN1 to be strikingly similar. These findings suggest that simpler branched structures may be more important substrates for Gen orthologs in vivo, and highlight the utility of using the Drosophila model system to further understand these enzymes.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsBase SequenceCytoplasmDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, CruciformDNA ReplicationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEndonucleasesHolliday Junction ResolvasesHumansModels, BiologicalMutationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, CruciformDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesGEN1 protein, humanGEN protein, DrosophilaHolliday Junction ResolvasesMUS81 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28369583
PMCPMC5435919
OpenAlexW2601904734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.