ArticleGigaScience2016
Bermuda 2.0: reflections from Santa Cruz.
Article in GigaScience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Meanings in the Archive: Privacy, Technological Change and the Status of Sources.Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte · 2022Article
- Narrative online guides for the interpretation of digital-pathology images and tissue-atlas data.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- Is it time to change the reference genome?Genome biology · 2019Article
- Societal Implications of the Internet of Pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.Journal of the history of biology · 2018Article
- Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Moving beyond Bermuda: sharing data to build a medical information commons.Genome research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In February 1996, the genome community met in Bermuda to formulate principles for circulating genomic data. Although it is now 20 years since the Bermuda Principles were formulated, they continue to play a central role in shaping genomic and data-sharing practices. However, since 1996, "openness" has become an increasingly complex issue. This commentary seeks to articulate three core challenges data-sharing faces today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.