Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369359›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2016

Plant specimen contextual data consensus.

Petra Ten Hoopen, Ramona L Walls, Ethalinda Ks Cannon, Guy Cochrane, James Cole, Anjanette Johnston, Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi, Pelin Yilmaz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Petra Ten HoopenEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Ramona L WallsCyVerse, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Ethalinda Ks CannonDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Guy CochraneEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
James ColeDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Anjanette JohnstonNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Building 38A, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Ilene Karsch-MizrachiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Building 38A, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Pelin YilmazMicrobial Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsius str. 1, Bremen 28359, Germany.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018458/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Compliance and Interoperability Working Group of the Genomic Standards Consortium facilitates the establishment of a community of experts and the development of recommendations to describe genomic data and associated information. Here we present our ongoing conation to harmonise the reporting of contextual plant specimen data associated with genomics and functional genomics. This commentary summarises the current state of our plant sample contextual data harmonisation efforts to engage a broad plant science community.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsMetadataPlantsSocieties, ScientificChecklistContextual dataPlantSpecimen

Identifiers

PMID28369359
PMCPMC5572840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.