Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369295›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Cranial Imaging Before Lumbar Puncture in Adults With Community-Acquired Meningitis: Clinical Utility and Adherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines.

Lucrecia Salazar, Rodrigo Hasbun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cranial Imaging and Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Suspected Central Nervous System Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Aseptic meningitis in adults and children: Diagnostic and management challenges.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucrecia SalazarDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Rodrigo HasbunDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Funding

Aseptic Meningoencephalitis Syndrome (AMS) In AdultsK23RR018929 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HASBUN, RODRIGO · 2006 to 2010
$607k
NCRR NIH HHS K23 RR018929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines delineate criteria for the use of computed tomography (CT) scan of the head before lumbar puncture (LP) in adults with community-acquired meningitis (CAM). There are limited data to document adherence to these guidelines and assess the clinical utility of brain imaging. METHODS.: This was a retrospective analysis from January 2005 to January 2010 in Houston, Texas. RESULTS.: Among 614 adults with CAM, 407 patients (66.3%) did not have an indication for a head CT scan and 207 (33.7%) did. Patients with a CT scan indication were older, had more comorbidities, were sicker, and had more urgent treatable etiologies and adverse clinical outcomes (P < .001). A CT scan was ordered before the LP in 549 patients (89%). Overall, clinicians did not adhere to clinical guidelines in 368 of 614 (60%) subjects. A CT of the head was ordered when not indicated in 355 of 549 patients (64%), and not done when indicated in 13 of 207 patients (0.6%). CT of the head revealed intracranial abnormalities in 35 of 193 patients (18.1%) with an indication for brain imaging, compared with only 2 of 356 (0.05%) with no indication (P < .05). Major intracranial findings were seen in only 15 of 549 (2.7%) patients, all with an indication for brain imaging. Furthermore, only 8 patients had abnormalities that affected clinical management. CONCLUSIONS.: Most clinicians do not adhere to IDSA guidelines, delaying diagnostic LP and increasing costs. Usefulness of head CT in patients with CAM without an indication for imaging is limited and has no impact in clinical management.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicable DiseasesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMeningitis, BacterialMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSkullhead CTlumbar puncturemeningitis.

Identifiers

PMID28369295
PMCPMC5850549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.