Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369198›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials.

Shabir A Madhi, Marta C Nunes, Adriana Weinberg, Locadiah Kuwanda, Andrea Hugo, Stephanie Jones, Nadia van Niekerk, Justin R Ortiz, Kathleen M Neuzil, Keith P Klugman and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01306669 phase3completednot on this map

Vaccination of HIV-uninfected Pregnant Women With Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Prevention of Influenza Illness During Early Infancy and in Mothers: Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial Evaluating Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Witwatersrand, South AfricaRan2011 to 2013Enrolled2,116ConditionsInfluenzaArmsTrivalent influenza vaccine, Normal saline
NCT01306682 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Pregnant Women and Kinetics of Transplacental Anti-influenza Antibody Transfer and Persistence in Young Infants: A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Witwatersrand, South AfricaRan2011 to 2012Enrolled194ConditionsInfluenzaArmsTrivalent influenza vaccine, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Shabir A MadhiDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Marta C NunesDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Adriana WeinbergSchool of Medicine and Children's Hospital, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Locadiah KuwandaDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Andrea HugoDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Stephanie JonesDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Nadia van NiekerkDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Justin R OrtizDepartment of Medicine and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kathleen M NeuzilCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Keith P KlugmanSchool of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Eric A F SimõesDepartment of Pediatrics, Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and.
Clare L CutlandDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases and.
Maternal Flu Trial (Matflu) Team
National Research Foundation · ZARespiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAMedical Research Council · GBUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in women vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS.: We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women. SDI was defined as ≥4-fold increase in paired hemagglutinin antibody inhibition titers from 1 month postvaccination until end-of-study participation. PCR-CI was defined as molecular diagnostic evidence of influenza virus in pharyngeal specimens collected during clinical illness. RESULTS.: Among placebo recipients, the respective incidence of PCR-CI and SDI was 5.6% and 35.0% in HIV-uninfected women and 20.5% and 43.6% among HIV-infected women. Vaccine efficacy in HIV-uninfected women was similar for PCR-CI (66.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -20.1% to 90.9%) and SDI (59.2%; 95% CI, 37.0%-73.5%); however, fewer women required vaccination to prevent 1 episode of SDI (5; 95% CI, 3-9) than PCR-CI (27; 95% CI, 12-∞). Also, vaccine efficacy was similar for PCR-CI (61.2%; 95% CI, 10.7%-83.2%) and SDI (60.9%; 95% CI, 33.9%-76.9%) in HIV-infected women, with 2-fold fewer women needing to be vaccinated to prevent SDI (4; 95% CI, 3-8) than PCR-CI (8; 95% CI, 4-52). CONCLUSIONS.: Although vaccine efficacy was similar when measured for PCR-CI or SDI, IIV vaccination prevented a greater number of SDI than PCR-CI; the clinical relevance of the former warrants interrogation.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01306669 and NCT01306682.

Indexed as

Hemagglutination Inhibition TestsAdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesOrthomyxoviridaePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedefficacyhemagglutination inhibition assay.immunogenicityinfluenza vaccinephase III trial

Identifiers

PMID28369198
PMCPMC5447878
OpenAlexW2601846502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.