Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369168›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

ConKit: a python interface to contact predictions.

Felix Simkovic, Jens M H Thomas, Daniel J Rigden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predicted models and CCP4.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  3. The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The ghrelinThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Approaches to ab initio molecular replacement of α-helical transmembrane proteins.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix SimkovicDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jens M H ThomasDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel J RigdenDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryRecent advances in protein residue contact prediction algorithms have led to the emergence of many new methods and a variety of file formats. We present ConKit , an open source, modular and extensible Python interface which allows facile conversion between formats and provides an interface to analyses of sequence alignments and sets of contact predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ConKit is available via the Python Package Index. The documentation can be found at http://www.conkit.org . ConKit is licensed under the BSD 3-Clause. CONTACT: hlfsimko@liverpool.ac.uk or drigden@liverpool.ac.uk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceProteinsSequence AlignmentUser-Computer InterfaceProteins

Identifiers

PMID28369168
PMCPMC5870551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.