Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28369113›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A pilot study to assess residential noise exposure near natural gas compressor stations.

Meleah D Boyle, Sutyajeet Soneja, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Laura Dalemarre, Amy R Sapkota, Thurka Sangaramoorthy, Sacoby Wilson, Donald Milton, Amir Sapkota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Residential noise from nearby oil and gas well construction and drilling.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meleah D BoyleMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Sutyajeet SonejaMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-2432
Lesliam Quirós-AlcaláMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Laura DalemarreMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Amy R SapkotaMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Thurka SangaramoorthyDepartment of Anthropology, College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Sacoby WilsonMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Donald MiltonMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Amir SapkotaMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundU.S. natural gas production increased 40% from 2000 to 2015. This growth is largely related to technological advances in horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Environmental exposures upon impacted communities are a significant public health concern. Noise associated with natural gas compressor stations has been identified as a major concern for nearby residents, though limited studies exist.

objectivesWe conducted a pilot study to characterize noise levels in 11 homes located in Doddridge County, West Virginia, and determined whether these levels differed based on time of day, indoors vs. outdoors, and proximity of homes to natural gas compressor stations. We also compared noise levels at increasing distances from compressor stations to available noise guidelines, and evaluated low frequency noise presence.

methodsWe collected indoor and outdoor 24-hour measurements (Leq, 24hr) in eight homes located within 750 meters (m) of the nearest compressor station and three control homes located >1000m. We then evaluated how A-weighted decibel (dBA) exposure levels differed based on factors outlined above.

resultsThe geometric mean (GM) for 24-hour outdoor noise levels at homes located <300m (Leq,24hr: 60.3 dBA; geometric standard deviation (GSD): 1.0) from the nearest compressor station was nearly 9 dBA higher than control homes (Leq,24hr: 51.6 dBA; GSD: 1.1). GM for 24 hour indoor noise for homes <300m (Leq,24hr: 53.4 dBA; GSD: 1.2) from the nearest compressor station was 11.2 dBA higher than control homes (Leq,24hr: 42.2 dBA; GSD: 1.1). Indoor average daytime noise for homes <300m of the nearest compressor stations were 13.1 dBA higher than control homes, while indoor nighttime readings were 9.4 dBA higher.

conclusionsFindings indicate that living near a natural gas compressor station could potentially result in high environmental noise exposures. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate potential health impacts and protection measures.

Indexed as

Natural GasEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHousingHumansNoisePilot ProjectsPublic HealthWest VirginiaNatural Gas

Identifiers

PMID28369113
PMCPMC5378322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.