Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368789›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2017

Design and Implementation of a Physician Coaching Pilot to Promote Value-Based Referrals to Specialty Care.

Leah Tuzzio, Evette J Ludman, Eva Chang, Lorella Palazzo, Travis Abbott, Edward H Wagner, Robert J Reid

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah TuzzioResearch Associate at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute) in Seattle, WA. tuzzio.l@ghc.org.
Evette J LudmanSenior Research Associate at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute) in Seattle, WA. ludman.e@ghc.org.
Eva ChangResearch Public Health Analyst at RTI International in Waltham, MA. echang@rti.org.
Lorella PalazzoResearch Associate at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute) in Seattle, WA. palazzo.l@ghc.org.
Travis AbbottFamily Physician at Group Health Cooperative in Seattle, WA. abbott.a@ghc.org.
Edward H WagnerDirector Emeritus of the MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute) in Seattle, WA. wagner.e@ghc.org.
Robert J ReidChief Scientist for Better Health at Trillium Health Partners Institute in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. robert.reid@trilliumhealthpartners.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReferral rates to specialty care from primary care physicians vary widely. To address this variability, we developed and pilot tested a peer-to-peer coaching program for primary care physicians.

objectivesTo assess the feasibility and acceptability of the coaching program, which gave physicians access to their individual-level referral data, strategies, and a forum to discuss referral decisions.

methodsThe team designed the program using physician input and a synthesis of the literature on the determinants of referral. We conducted a single-arm observational pilot with eight physicians which made up four dyads, and conducted a qualitative evaluation.

resultsPrimary reasons for making referrals were clinical uncertainty and patient request. Physicians perceived doctor-to-doctor dialogue enabled mutual learning and a pathway to return joy to the practice of primary care medicine. The program helped physicians become aware of their own referral data, reasons for making referrals, and new strategies to use in their practice. Time constraints caused by large workloads were cited as a barrier both to participating in the pilot and to practicing in ways that optimize referrals. Physicians reported that the program could be sustained and spread if time for mentoring conversations was provided and/or nonfinancial incentives or compensation was offered.

conclusionThis physician mentoring program aimed at reducing specialty referral rates is feasible and acceptable in primary care settings. Increasing the appropriateness of referrals has the potential to provide patient-centered care, reduce costs for the system, and improve physician satisfaction.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelLearningMentoringPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Program EvaluationReferral and ConsultationCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInterprofessional RelationsJob SatisfactionPatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID28368789
PMCPMC5378485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.