Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368471›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of infectious diseases2017

Effectiveness of Early Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination Among 6-14-Month-Old Infants During an Epidemic in the Netherlands: An Observational Cohort Study.

Tom Woudenberg, Nicoline A T van der Maas, Mirjam J Knol, Hester de Melker, Rob S van Binnendijk, Susan J M Hahné

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom WoudenbergEpidemiology and Surveillance Unit and.
Nicoline A T van der MaasEpidemiology and Surveillance Unit and.
Mirjam J KnolEpidemiology and Surveillance Unit and.
Hester de MelkerEpidemiology and Surveillance Unit and.
Rob S van BinnendijkCenter for Infectious Diseases Research, Diagnostics, and Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Susan J M HahnéEpidemiology and Surveillance Unit and.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Routinely, the first measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine dose is given at 14 months of age in the Netherlands. However, during a measles epidemic in 2013-2014, MMR vaccination was also offered to 6-14-month-olds in municipalities with <90% MMR vaccination coverage. We studied the effectiveness of the early MMR vaccination schedule. Methods: Parents of all infants targeted for early MMR vaccination were asked to participate. When parent(s) suspected measles, their infant's saliva was tested for measles-specific antibodies. The vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed and self-reported measles was estimated using Cox regression, with VE calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Results: Three vaccinated and 10 unvaccinated laboratory-confirmed cases occurred over observation times of 106631 and 23769 days, respectively. The unadjusted VE against laboratory-confirmed measles was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-98%). After adjustment for religion and sibling's vaccination status, the VE decreased to 71% (-72%-95%). For self-reported measles, the unadjusted and adjusted VE was 67% (40%-82%) and 43% (-12%-71%), respectively. Conclusions: Infants vaccinated between 6 and 14 months of age had a lower risk of measles than unvaccinated infants. However, part of the effect was caused by herd immunity, since vaccinated infants were more likely to be surrounded by other vaccinated individuals.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantMaleMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMumpsNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRubellaSalivaSelf ReportVaccinationAntibodies, ViralMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccineearly MMRinfantsMeaslesvaccination.vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID28368471
OpenAlexW2603395538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.