Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368441›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

J Grasselli, E Elez, G Caratù, J Matito, C Santos, T Macarulla, J Vidal, M Garcia, J M Viéitez, D Paéz and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Controversies in the treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Clinical utility of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Detection ofOncology research · 2026
    Article
  17. Quantitative ctDNA Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

J GrasselliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
E ElezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
G CaratùCancer Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
J MatitoCancer Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
C SantosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona.
T MacarullaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
J VidalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Del Mar University Hospital, Barcelona.
M GarciaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona.
J M ViéitezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Asturias University Hospital, Oviedo.
D PaézDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Creu i Sant Pau University Hospital, Barcelona.
E FalcóDepartment of Medical Oncology, Son Llatzer University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca.
C Lopez LopezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander.
E ArandaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
F JonesSysmex Inostics, Mundelein, USA.
V SikriSysmex Inostics, Mundelein, USA.
P NuciforoMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
R FasaniMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
J TaberneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
C MontagutDepartment of Medical Oncology, Del Mar University Hospital, Barcelona.
D AzuaraTraslational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona.
R DienstmannDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
R SalazarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona.
A VivancosCancer Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
Vall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Son Llatzer · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential source for tumor genome analysis. We explored the concordance between the mutational status of RAS in tumor tissue and ctDNA in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients to establish eligibility for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective-retrospective cohort study was carried out. Tumor tissue from 146 mCRC patients was tested for RAS status with standard of care (SoC) PCR techniques, and Digital PCR (BEAMing) was used both in plasma and tumor tissue.

resultsctDNA BEAMing RAS testing showed 89.7% agreement with SoC (Kappa index 0.80; 95% CI 0.71 - 0.90) and BEAMing in tissue showed 90.9% agreement with SoC (Kappa index 0.83; 95% CI 0.74 - 0.92). Fifteen cases (10.3%) showed discordant tissue-plasma results. ctDNA analysis identified nine cases of low frequency RAS mutations that were not detected in tissue, possibly due to technical sensitivity or heterogeneity. In six cases, RAS mutations were not detected in plasma, potentially explained by low tumor burden or ctDNA shedding. Prediction of treatment benefit in patients receiving anti-EGFR plus irinotecan in second- or third-line was equivalent if tested with SoC PCR and ctDNA. Forty-eight percent of the patients showed mutant allele fractions in plasma below 1%.

conclusionsPlasma RAS determination showed high overall agreement and captured a mCRC population responsive to anti-EGFR therapy with the same predictive level as SoC tissue testing. The feasibility and practicality of ctDNA analysis may translate into an alternative tool for anti-EGFR treatment selection.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutationColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisErbB Receptorsanti-EGFR therapycirculating tumor DNAmetastatic colorectal cancerRAS analysis

Identifiers

PMID28368441
PMCPMC5834108
OpenAlexW2602324018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.