Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368345›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2017

Endovascular Embolization by Transcatheter Delivery of Particles: Past, Present, and Future.

Rahul A Sheth, Sharjeel Sabir, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Reginald K Avery, Yu Shrike Zhang, Ali Khademhosseini, Rahmi Oklu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Renal embolization for trauma: a narrative review.Journal of trauma and injury · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Embolic Agents: Particles.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Oncopharmacology in Interventional Radiology.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahul A ShethDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. rasheth@mdanderson.org.
Sharjeel SabirDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. shsabir@mdanderson.org.
Savitri KrishnamurthyDepartment of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. skrishna@mdanderson.org.
Reginald K AveryWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. avery.reginald@gmail.com.
Yu Shrike ZhangWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. yszhang@mit.edu.
Ali KhademhosseiniWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. alik@bwh.harvard.edu.
Rahmi OkluBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02139, USA. oklu.rahmi@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques to occlude flow within blood vessels, initially pioneered in the 1970s with autologous materials and subsequently advanced with increasingly sophisticated engineered biomaterials, are routinely performed for a variety of medical conditions. Contemporary interventional radiologists have at their disposal a wide armamentarium of occlusive agents to treat a range of disease processes through a small incision in the skin. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on endovascular embolization tools, summarize the current state-of-the-art, and highlight burgeoning technologies that promise to advance the field in the near future.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbiomedical devicescardiovascular devicesdrug delivery systemsmicrofluidicsmicrospheres

Identifiers

PMID28368345
PMCPMC5491993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.