Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368320›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2017

Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms.

Derek Fleming, Kendra P Rumbaugh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. n-Butanol Extract ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. TargetingBiofilm · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Biofilm Dispersal inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Derek FlemingDepartments of Surgery, Immunology and Molecular Microbiology, and the TTUHSC Burn Center of Research Excellence, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. derek.fleming@ttuhsc.edu.
Kendra P RumbaughDepartments of Surgery, Immunology and Molecular Microbiology, and the TTUHSC Burn Center of Research Excellence, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. kendra.rumbaugh@ttuhsc.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in polymicrobial wound infectionsR01GM116547 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WHITELEY, MARVIN · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Interspecies Interactions in WouR15AI105763 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI RUMBAUGH, KENDRA P · 2014 to 2014
$448k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI105763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm-associated infections pose a complex problem to the medical community, in that residence within the protection of a biofilm affords pathogens greatly increased tolerances to antibiotics and antimicrobials, as well as protection from the host immune response. This results in highly recalcitrant, chronic infections and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since as much as 80% of human bacterial infections are biofilm-associated, many researchers have begun investigating therapies that specifically target the biofilm architecture, thereby dispersing the microbial cells into their more vulnerable, planktonic mode of life. This review addresses the current state of research into medical biofilm dispersal. We focus on three major classes of dispersal agents: enzymes (including proteases, deoxyribonucleases, and glycoside hydrolases), antibiofilm peptides, and dispersal molecules (including dispersal signals, anti-matrix molecules, and sequestration molecules). Throughout our discussion, we provide detailed lists and summaries of some of the most prominent and extensively researched dispersal agents that have shown promise against the biofilms of clinically relevant pathogens, and we catalog which specific microorganisms they have been shown to be effective against. Lastly, we discuss some of the main hurdles to development of biofilm dispersal agents, and contemplate what needs to be done to overcome them.

Indexed as

biofilmdispersaldispersal agent

Identifiers

PMID28368320
PMCPMC5488086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.