Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368290›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Maturing of the nuclear receptor family.

Mitchell A Lazar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. RXRActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nuclear Receptors in Health and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mitchell A Lazar

Funding

REV-ERB Nuclear Receptors in Circadian Rhythm and MetabolismR01DK045586 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MITCHELL A. LAZAR · 1992 to 2026
$12.0M
Nuclear Receptors in Metabolic TissuesR01DK049780 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAZAR, MITCHELL A. · 1995 to 2025
$10.8M
THYROID HORMONE RECEPTORS-REGULATION AND FUNCTIONR37DK043806 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAZAR, MITCHELL A. · 1998 to 2017
$8.8M
THYROID HORMONE RECEPTORS--REGULATION AND FUNCTIONR01DK043806 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MITCHELL A. LAZAR · 1991 to 2026
$4.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK043806NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK045586NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049780NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK043806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily of ligand-regulated transcription factors play important roles in reproduction, development, and physiology. In humans, genetic mutations in NRs are causes of rare diseases, while hormones and drugs that target NRs are in widespread therapeutic use. The present issue of the JCI includes a series of Review articles focused on specific NRs and their wide range of biological functions. Here I reflect on the past, present, and potential future highlights of research on the NR superfamily.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID28368290
PMCPMC5373857
OpenAlexW2598803157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.